Skip to main content

The Top 10 Film Costume Designs of the Decade. Part II

Earlier this year I released my Part I of my Top 10 Film Costume Designs of the Decade list, which covered the number 10 spot all through the number 6 spot. Now (finally) ladies and gentlemen, I present to you, my number 5 through 1!


5. THE DRESSMAKER (Jocelyn Moorhouse, 2015). Costume Design by Marion Boyce and Margot Wilson.

The Dressmaker is a story about lies, secrets, and fashion. It feels only natural then, that the movie, despite the tonal whiplash and overall weird storytelling choices, is blessed with a glorious Costume Design. The costumes here are not only eye candy but become an integral part of the story, the characters, and the film's themes.

Indeed, such was the scope of the enterprise, costume-wise that they split the Costume Design into the hands of two different Designers. Marion Boyce did all the costumes regarding the townspeople, and Margot Wilson focussed only on the costumes for Winslet's character.


The movie explores the true nature of people and how clothes help define that. A clever twist on the traditional makeover narrative, as those who do get a makeover, do not really deserve it, nor does it make them better people. Fashion doesn't help you be who you want to be: it only allows you to pretend to be the person you want to be.

It's especially noteworthy the brilliant use of color, contour, texture, and style to first build the ugly reality these characters live in and then to create the fantasy that high couture allows them to experience.

When we meet these town's folk, they are all dressed in earthy, bleak tones and a tea-colored palette matched with cotton pinafores and smocks and rough-spoon aprons. This costuming choice visually blends them into the desolated landscape in which they live. It creates a sense of barrenness and decay; of close-mindedness and uniformity. And in that way, it captures the spirit of the town and its people.


In contrast, Kate Winslet's character is the only dressed in warm, rich tones when wearing her regular day to day clothes, as if to point out how much she doesn't fit in. She's not dull and lifeless; she's filled to the brim with creativity and life despite her hardships and traumas.


Accordingly, the costumes she designs and sews are bright-colored, highly-tailored, and fashion-forward pieces of art that allow these dull people to pretend to be who they always wanted to be, underlining the idea of the transformative power of costume, even if that transformation is only surface deep.


What makes these designs truly exceptional is that they come together to create a movie that, at its core, is a love letter to fashion. It's a beautiful ode to designers and seamstresses around the world. An assertion of costume-making as something more than vain pandering to women. A statement about the importance of owning one's personality and style. An invitation to express ourselves through costuming. 

The Dressmaker was included on my 2016's Top Favorite Costume Designs List 
and on a two-part deep dive about the movie (part I, part II).

4. WONDER WOMAN (Patty Jenkins, 2017). Costume Design by Lindy Hemming.

This past decade has been, undoubtedly, an incredibly fertile decade for comic book movies. It was only logical that one of them would qualify for this list. So, out of all the comic-book adaptations that were brought forward to the silver screen this decade, why is this one the best?

There are many reasons, but the one that stands out to me is simply that it had a much harder job than any other. First and foremost, because everyone (even people who've never read a comic book) can tell you what Wonder Woman looks like, so they couldn't just redesign the costume to fit the movie as they did with Captain Marvel or the X-Men saga. She is such an iconic character that it was impossible to wipe the slate clean. Add to this the fact that designing for a female superhero is a tricky thing due to the usual trappings of female superhero costumes that are set in place to objectify and oversexualize the character and you are setting up yourself for failure. And yet, somehow, Lindy Hemming managed not only to make it work but to make it stand out.


The final design takes a lot of the classic Wonder Woman costume, and yet, it feels essentially different. And the main reason why is its intent. It aims to be understood as armor. And logically, it goes to take its influence from Roman and Greek armor. This is particularly noticeable when looking at her boots. Traditionally, Wonder Woman's boots had no practical function, they were there for aesthetic purposes only. Hemmings instead fashioned her "boots" to resemble  Roman greaves, which are real battle wear designed to protect the knees and the lower legs.


Also noteworthy is the fact that the movie needed to create a wardrobe for the whole of the Amazon culture in a way that felt integrated with the already established Wonder Woman aesthetics. Not an easy feat indeed. Maintaining the Roman-inspired basic structure seems easy enough. Integrating the bright colors of the Wonder Woman suit feels somehow harder.

Here Hemmings brought forward a clever idea. On one end of the spectrum are the gritty, realistic earth tones of Antiope and her warriors, and on the other end, there's the cleaner and more plastic look of the higher echelons of the Amazon leadership. This creates the thematic link between color and Godhood: the closer to the Gods, the more color you wear. It's a clever design conceptualization that goes a long way without actually calling attention to itself.


All in all, the film had to come up with a costume that would evoke the more classic Lynda Carter costume whilst also creating something that would fit well into the setting of the movie and made sense as armor and all the while avoiding possible criticisms for over-sexualization whilst satisfying the higher-ups' at Warner Bros. And they did it with flying colors. That's why it's my number 4 pick.

Wonder Woman was included on my 2017's Top Favorite Costume Designs List 
and a deep dive article on the movie.

3. MIRROR MIRROR (Tarsem Singh, 2012). Costume Design by Eiko Ishioka.

It seems like ages ago, but it was only the early 2010's when Hollywood's obsession with reimagining fairytales translated into a never-ending parade of terrible fantasy films. The trend got so out of control that in 2012, within the span of a few months, we saw the release of not one, but two movies retelling the same fairy tale. On the one hand, there was Snow White & the Huntsman, a blockbuster with epic aspirations, and on the other, there was Mirror, Mirror, a more classic approach to the story. Neither was particularly good, but the latter, thanks to the collaboration between Indian filmmaker Tarsem Singh and Costume Designer Eiko Ishioka, managed to create incredibly memorable visuals to boost the film.

Acclaimed Japanese artist Eiko Ishioka (art director, costume designer, and graphic designer) is a legend both in stage, screen, advertising, and print media. She is the mind behind the iconic costume design of Francis Ford Coppola's Dracula (1992) and had previously worked with Indian filmmaker Tarsem Singh on The Cell (2000) and The Fall (2006) when she came on board for Mirror, mirror. Unfortunately, she passed away right before the movie was released.


Ishioka's design is both extremely classic and extremely modern. It takes the aesthetics of the past (particularly the 16th to 19th century) and combines it with bright synthetics colors to create the film's fantasy feel.


Also particularly noteworthy is the extreme color coordination between the set design and the costume design, which help create a very artificial look, which in turn helps create the idea that you are watching a fairytale as distanced from reality as possible.


The costume Design for Mirror, Mirror is a fairy tale brought to life in the most exquisite way: it's classic, yet unique and original. It's the final masterpiece of a legendary designer, and that's enough to secure its spot on this list.

Mirror, Mirror was the focus on the second installment of my series of articles dedicated to designing a fairy tale.

2. LA LA LAND (Damien Chazelle, 2016). Costume Design by Mary Zophres.

A lot of people hold the prejudice that there is no real merit in the Costume Design for a Contemporary Film. I absolutely hate that mentality. Whilst it is true that it's cheaper to dress your actors for a contemporary setting, that doesn't mean that it doesn't require the same talent, creativity, and resourcefulness when it comes to creating a concept that enhances the story. This mentality became plenty obvious when La La Land secured its nomination for Best Achievement in Costume Design. Had it won, it would have been the first contemporary film to win Best Costume Design in 22 years (the last one to do so was Priscilla, Queen of the Desert in 1994).

Another misconception that I can't stand is the association between Contemporary and Realism. One does not equal the other. La La Land aims to create an alternative version of our world; a better, more emotional one; an expressionistic version of our reality. This is strongly reinforced in the costume design through the use of color, textures, and the constant blending of retro fashion trends with contemporary sensibilities to create a timeless feeling around the characters and the story.


Mia, when she is first introduced to the audience, is a wide-eyed dreamer. To reflect that, Zophres created a vibrant, vivacious, and colorful wardrobe that denotes youthful self-assertion. It also creates this old-Hollywood vibe that matches perfectly the nostalgic feeling of the movie as a whole. As the movie progresses, Mia starts to become more self-assured of her own talents and her own place in the world. She starts to focus more on her work. That causes a slow shift in the costumes: color starts to become less bold, more de-saturated, and the dresses start to be less dramatic, less Hollywood-like. It is no coincidence that its when she goes back home when her wardrobe is the closest to real contemporary clothing. She's in jeans and sweaters and very tame and de-saturated colors.


This, coupled with flawless coordination between costumes and production design, which complement and enhance each other beautifully, manages to evoke in the viewer an intoxicating feeling of nostalgia whilst at the same time creating a dream-like mood for the story.
 

Yet the biggest achievement of it all is that it manages to feel completely effortless, just as any good dance number should. That alone has guaranteed a spot for the film on this list.

La La Land was included on my 2016's Top Favorite Costume Designs List 
and on that year's Oscar Retrospective.

1. CRIMSON PEAK (Guillermo del Toro, 2015). Costume Design by Kate Hawley.

Guillermo del Toro's 2015 gothic tale is a visual delight, and its Costume Design, created by del Toro's usual collaborator, Kate Hawley, has stuck in my mind since the first time I saw it. 

Hawley's designs are built from scratch using period fashion, textures, color, and decorative elements to visually reinforce the characters, the differences between them and the world they inhabit. It helps create certain ideas around the characters and their place in this story.

I wholeheartedly believe that it was the best costume design of that year and it is a shame and an absolute travesty that it did not even get a nomination for Best Costume Design.


I find particularly interesting the use of period costuming to establish a key difference between the two antagonists, Edith and Lucille. The movie takes place in 1901, right at the turn of the century, when women's fashion was beginning to relax coinciding with the beginning of the suffragette movement and the "modern woman". Edith, an aspiring American writer, is dressed accordingly. Lucille, a broke, run-down European aristocrat is not. She's dressed to match the fashion of the 1880s, placing her out of fashion by a good twenty years.

This doesn't only make sense within the narrative (the Sharpe's are broke and are still wearing their parents' clothes), but it builds thematically on the characters. The 1900s fashion, with its billowy sleeves and shirts and ties, represents the working woman, the future. On the other hand, the 1880s constricting fashion represents the past, the binding restrictions of an era gone by. Edith looks to the future, while Lucille is stuck in the past.


Much in the same way, the design assigns certain colors to each of them to build around this idea. Lucille is dressed in dark, ominous colors: blue, black, and blood red. Meanwhile, Edith is draped in hues of yellow and gold, creating a stunning visual contrast: they are like day and night. Edith, with her eyes set on the future, is dressed in bright colors. Lucille, anchored in the past, drowns in darkness.


Last but not least, Hawley dedicated an enormous amount of effort into the detailing of the gowns, adding little things that would reinforce the characters and their themes. For example, the lacing at the back of Lucille's red dress is designed to look like a human skeleton's spine to underline the starvation and hunger she's gone through her life and how she's been defined by it. Through the way the dress is constructed, it gives the feeling that bones are protruding from her, further connecting her character to the concept of death.

Much in the same way, the garland of leaves and acorns encircles Lucille's blue gown like a vine that simultaneously protects and strangulates her. It's almost like the vegetation is growing out of the earth and twisting itself around her. As if she's slowly becoming part of the architecture.


All in all, Hawley's design's main strength lies in its narrative prowess: its ability to create intricate and detailed pieces that use every tool in the toolshed to add to the character and describe what’s happening to herself and to the world around her. And because of this, there was absolutely no doubt in my mind that this should be my number 1 pick for Best Film Costume Design of the Decade.

Crimson Peak was included on my 2015's Top Favorite Costume Designs List 
and on a two-part deep dive about the movie (part Ipart II).

YOU CAN FIND MY NUMBER 10 TO 6 HERE

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoyed this article and would like to support the blog, 
consider buying me a Coffee? 💛💛

If you want more content like this, subscribe! Or come say hi on FacebookTumblrTwitterInstagram and help us grow!

DISCLAIMER: I claim no credit for images featured on this site unless noted. Visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners, and inclusion here is under fair use for criticism, comment, and news reporting purposes. If you own the rights to content here and wish it removed, please contact me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good. The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right. Today, my goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex B

Love her or hate her, Padme and her costumes can never be far from our minds. They are too iconic, and probably one of the few memorable aspects of the prequels, so it's really fun to talk about them. And so, I've decided to continue what I started and focus on the costumes I left behind from Episode II . So let's dive back into it! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX B: THE ATTACK OF THE CLONES Episode II: The Attack of the Clones brings the character and her designs to a completely different level; she is not a queen anymore, which unfortunately means that she no longer has amazingly weird an

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs' main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume. But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous? To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed the 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But wh

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for me to join the yelling contest, I guess. If I'm going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise. The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there. In the tales that the G

Why Oh Why? Peaky Blinders and the mystery of Grace's Crappy Hair

There are many unanswered questions out there. Many, many mysteries that will never be unraveled. But amongst those, the one that keeps me up at night is why was Grace's hair so crappy during the first season of Peaky Blinders ? Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Peaky Blinders . I'm human, believe it or not. I've watched all its five seasons (twice) and I'm impatiently waiting for its sixth season with bated breath. And I can vouch for it: it's a quality show. Good storytelling, good acting, great photography... and for the most part, great character design both in costume design and hair and makeup. That's why I'm still baffled by the decision of having Grace's character sporting what amounts to limp California Beach Waves for the whole of the first season.  Because, while it is true that the first season had a considerably lower budget than its following installments, a shitty approach to historical accuracy wasn't the general tone for the

Cleopatra or the Most Undeserved Oscar Win ever

There is a reason why I usually do not review movies from the "golden age" of Hollywood (which means any movie prior to the 1970s), and that is because back then they cared even less about historical accuracy in costuming than nowadays, which is saying a lot. Because of this, most of the "historical" movies generally ignored the period and just did whatever was fashionable at the time with a spice of the supposed period. This is something that usually makes me laugh, rather than angry, because it results in very funny outfits (peplums particularly created a lot of funny imaginary). And Cleopatra , 1963's epic about the Egyptian queen, was for most of my childhood one of those movies. I knew the costumes were not accurate, but they fascinated me anyways in their ridiculousness. That is until I heard that the movie had won an Academy Award for Best Achievement in Costume Design, the same year that " Il Gattopardo  was nominated for Best Costume Design. A

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex C

It's been a while, but I always come back to her in the end. Padmé Amidala, from the Star Wars Prequels, is a Style Icon and my personal standout from the mess that Episode I to III ended up being. Because of it, I've decided it was time to finish what I started so long ago and finally address Episode III . It took me long enough.  So let's dive back into it for one last chance to love, hate, snark and bark at the astonishing monstrosity that is Padmé's Wardrobe! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX C: REVENGE OF THE SITH Episode III: Revenge of the Sith brings the prequel trilogy to a close and, ve

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe - Opposite Lucille stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap. PART II: THE BUTTERFLY Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the mo

The FollowUP: Disney's Jasmine and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Previously in this blog, I talked about how the aesthetics of the Disney Princess Brand have changed through the different iterations of Cinderella (read here ). Since then, Disney hasn't stopped rehashing and remaking its old animated classics. On the contrary, it has doubled down on this business model and its remakes have become more common, more widespread, and more successful. Since the 2015 remake of Cinderella , Disney has remade The Jungle Book (April 2016), Beauty and the Beast (March 2017), Dumbo (March 2019), Aladdin (May 2019), The Lion King (July 2019), Lady and the Tramp (November 2019), Mulan (scheduled for release July 2020) and Cruella (scheduled for release May 2021). Remakes for Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs , Pinocchio , The Little Mermaid , The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and Bambi are in development. Clearly, the live-action remake has become a staple of the brand and it cannot be ignored. Unfortunately. Seeing that this industry trend will not go any

Moulin Rouge and the art of Kitsch

The spring of 2001 saw the release of Moulin Rouge! unexpectedly shake the movie industry and the box office simultaneously. Despite the many awards, including 8 nominations at the Academy Awards, and the impressive box office numbers, the movie quickly became very polarizing for audiences. Love and hate seemed to be the only two possible reactions to the movie itself. But that should not come as a surprise. The film was directed by Baz Luhrman, who has consistently been, throughout his career, one of the most polarizing filmmakers of his generation. I still have to meet anyone who simply doesn't mind his movies (which include Romeo+Juliet , Australia and The Great Gatsby ); it's either absolute love or absolute loathing. There is no middle ground with him. And that's mainly because he himself doesn't compromise when it comes to his style, which is so characteristic at this point (fast and frantic editing, vivid use of flashy colors and sparkle and stories a