Skip to main content

Period Movies to Survive a Quarantine. Part II

This week I'll briefly expand on more of the recommendations I've been posting on social media so you'll be able to make a more informed decision when choosing your choice entertainment for the afternoon. This time I'll cover the recommendation I made from March 31st to April 9th.


Recommendation for MARCH 31st


It is hardly a secret to those who know me that I do not care for Jane Austen’s EMMA. It’s not open dislike, just simple indifference. Well, Autumn de Wilde’s new take of the story might have changed that to adoration.

The film highlights the absurd, satiric, and comedic aspects of the story and the characters in a way that feels fresh. Not trying to make Emma likable might be its best bet and works wonders in making her seem three dimensional as a character, as well as having the ironic result of actually making me like her more.

Here, the costume design plays a vital role in creating a highly plastic and artificial world to match the story’s tone, as well as showcasing individual and contrasting personalities.

An absolute must-watch for anyone interested in Austen, Costume Design, or film in general. It’s a real shame that it couldn’t have premiered in cinemas because of this whole pandemic and end of the world situation. We owe it a deep dive review.

Recommendation for APRIL 1st


If there is a novel worth adapting to a Gothic Horror extravaganza is Bram Stoker’s DRACULA. And Coppola didn’t disappoint.

He counterbalances the simplicity (and over-familiarity) of the story with a stunning visual presentation and a fascination with recreating early century cinema effects and approach to filmmaking.

This adaptation also brings to the foreground the underlying fear of sexuality in which every vampire story is based on, yet so often ignored.

But the highlight of the movie, to me, are the amazing creations of the costume department. The iconic Eiko Ishioka doesn’t constrain herself with period-accurate late 19th-century fashion, instead pulling from a wide array of cultures to give the story and alien and out of the ordinary feel. And it works wonders.

This movie has been in our to-review list forever, and somehow we’ve still haven’t reviewed it. We certainly owe it a review.

Recommendation for APRIL 2nd


It is quite undeniable that I love it when non-western directors take on iconic western stories to adapt. Such is the case with the 1998 biopic ELIZABETH. Directed by Shekhar Kapur, the movie tells the story of the early years of the Virgin Queen, and he has no quarrels in turning history into high drama. And I absolutely live for it.

This is a highly stylized, highly dramatized take on a figure that is widely known that focuses more on the nature of myth-making that on strictly being a biopic, and that’s why it works.

The costume design follows the movie’s lead and turns 16th-century fashion and stylizes it to accentuate the larger than life nature of these characters.

As an all-time favorite for us, we definitely owe it a review.

Recommendation for APRIL 3rd


CAROL, a movie based on Patricia Highsmith’s The Price of Salt, and masterfully directed by Todd Haynes, is the perfect mix between classical filmmaking and breakthrough storytelling. Filled with an incredible sense of beauty and subtlety, the movie explores a unique forbidden love story. 

Haynes’ sensibilities really shine here and manage to hold the audience captive for two whole hours. The key to this is simplicity and elegance. This is also the key behind the costumes for the movie, which work seamlessly into the narrative and help bring these characters into life.

Here’s the review we did for our Oscar Retrospective (Oscar Retrospective: Carol).

Recommendation for APRIL 4th


Out of all of the adaptations of LITTLE WOMEN, the first one I ever saw was the 1994′s version. As a result, this is the one that feels most nostalgic to me.

Whilst I absolutely adore Greta Gerwig’s newer version, I feel like these two adaptations couldn’t be more different.

Armstrong’s film is about the whimsical feel of childhood and the excitement of growing into adulthood, whilst Gerwig’s is about the nostalgia of childhood when the reality of adulthood sets in. A subtly different approach for many, but for me, it makes the two movies feel and read incredibly different (though equally enjoyable).

In the 1994 movie, the costume design is not only gorgeous but incredibly period accurate. The warm tones of the costumes match the warm tones of the movie, making it feel like Christmas whenever you give it a watch.

We’ve been wanting to do a review for the movie for a long time, but we never got around actually doing it. Shame on us.

Recommendation for APRIL 5th


Stanley Kubrick’s adaptation of BARRY LYNDON is a prime example than modern cinema and period accuracy is not necessarily at odds with each other, as it is so often assumed.

Much praise has been heaped onto the movie’s cinematography (well deserved, mind you), but the incredible work done by wardrobe, hair and makeup team is often overlooked. 

Yes, it was a feat to light a scene only with candlelight, but the level of detail and accuracy poured at the costume design is just a big an accomplishment. Every single detail of the look is taken into consideration, every hat, feather, and wig primed to look exactly as it should have looked. It’s stunning.

We’ve never done a review for the film, but I was lucky enough to photograph the real costumes a few years back (here, here, here, here and here).

Recommendation for APRIL 6th


2015′s BROOKLYN is a comforting tale about immigration and finding your own way in life. Truth be told, it is also a rather nostalgic view of the 1950′s in America.

Still, when I’m sad and all I want is a gorgeous movie with stunning performances to look at, I turn to Brooklyn.

As for the costume design, well, it’s a true beauty. Simple, yet effective, the costumes manage to tell the story of these characters and be absolute eye candy. It’s perfect.

Recommendation for APRIL 7th


I know this is a slightly controversial one for the Austen Fan Community, but I’ve never really cared for the BBC adaptation of Pride and Prejudice and I genuinely believe the 2005 adaptation is superior in every regard. There, I said it.

Joe Wright’s directorial debut promised a shining career, that was for sure. This is such a tight product that I can hardly find a flaw. True, there are certain deviations from the book, but they are there to make the story work better as a film.

As for the costume design, well I am also aware that it is quite controversial for its “loose” interpretation of regency clothing. With that said, it is perfect for the movie. True, it plays loosely with accuracy, but it works wonders in building the world, the characters and the tone of the movie. So that is enough for me.

I’ve been in love with this movie since it came out and we owe it a review for certain.

Recommendation for APRIL 8th


Disaster movies are quite the popular watch right now (though I honestly don’t know why anyone would want to watch Contagion right now…), but to this day, TITANIC is the only disaster movie I actually like.

Of course, it is only half a disaster movie. 

The other 50% is an unadulterated romance novel, and I live for it.

It also doesn’t hurt the movie to have one of my favorite costume designs ever. The incredible amount of detail and texture put into the costumes help build a world that feels real, tactile and creates a seamless illusion.

Why haven’t we done a review of this one yet? Beats me, to be honest.

Recommendation for APRIL 9th


2008′s THE DUCHESS is the personification of what people think of when they think of “period drama”, for good and bad.

It’s a good story, well told, well-paced and an entertaining watch, but it certainly fails at the originality department. All the cliches of the genre are there, and it’s hard not to get the feeling you’ve seen it all before.

Why am I recommending it then? Well, the costume design is simply magnificent. Michael O'Connor put such an incredible amount of accuracy, detail, and texture to the costumes that I am absolutely unable to look at anything else on the screen.

If you enjoy a good costume design and period dramas, do give it a watch. We most definitely owe it a deep dive review.

NEXT WEEK WE'LL BRING YOU MORE! (HERE)

Let me know your thoughts!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoyed this article and would like to support the blog, 
consider buying me a Coffee? 💛💛

If you want more content like this, subscribe! Or come say hi on FacebookTumblrTwitterInstagram and help us grow!

DISCLAIMER: I claim no credit for images featured on this site unless noted. Visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners, and inclusion here is under fair use for criticism, comment, and news reporting purposes. If you own the rights to content here and wish it removed, please contact me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good. The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right. Today, my goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming? ...

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex B

Love her or hate her, Padme and her costumes can never be far from our minds. They are too iconic, and probably one of the few memorable aspects of the prequels, so it's really fun to talk about them. And so, I've decided to continue what I started and focus on the costumes I left behind from Episode II . So let's dive back into it! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX B: THE ATTACK OF THE CLONES Episode II: The Attack of the Clones brings the character and her designs to a completely different level; she is not a queen anymore, which unfortunately means that she no longer has amazingly weird an...

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs' main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume. But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous? To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed the 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But wh...

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for me to join the yelling contest, I guess. If I'm going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise. The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there. In the tales that the G...

Why Oh Why? Peaky Blinders and the mystery of Grace's Crappy Hair

There are many unanswered questions out there. Many, many mysteries that will never be unraveled. But amongst those, the one that keeps me up at night is why was Grace's hair so crappy during the first season of Peaky Blinders ? Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Peaky Blinders . I'm human, believe it or not. I've watched all its five seasons (twice) and I'm impatiently waiting for its sixth season with bated breath. And I can vouch for it: it's a quality show. Good storytelling, good acting, great photography... and for the most part, great character design both in costume design and hair and makeup. That's why I'm still baffled by the decision of having Grace's character sporting what amounts to limp California Beach Waves for the whole of the first season.  Because, while it is true that the first season had a considerably lower budget than its following installments, a shitty approach to historical accuracy wasn't the general tone for the ...

Cleopatra or the Most Undeserved Oscar Win ever

There is a reason why I usually do not review movies from the "golden age" of Hollywood (which means any movie prior to the 1970s), and that is because back then they cared even less about historical accuracy in costuming than nowadays, which is saying a lot. Because of this, most of the "historical" movies generally ignored the period and just did whatever was fashionable at the time with a spice of the supposed period. This is something that usually makes me laugh, rather than angry, because it results in very funny outfits (peplums particularly created a lot of funny imaginary). And Cleopatra , 1963's epic about the Egyptian queen, was for most of my childhood one of those movies. I knew the costumes were not accurate, but they fascinated me anyways in their ridiculousness. That is until I heard that the movie had won an Academy Award for Best Achievement in Costume Design, the same year that " Il Gattopardo  was nominated for Best Costume Design. A...

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex C

It's been a while, but I always come back to her in the end. Padmé Amidala, from the Star Wars Prequels, is a Style Icon and my personal standout from the mess that Episode I to III ended up being. Because of it, I've decided it was time to finish what I started so long ago and finally address Episode III . It took me long enough.  So let's dive back into it for one last chance to love, hate, snark and bark at the astonishing monstrosity that is Padmé's Wardrobe! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX C: REVENGE OF THE SITH Episode III: Revenge of the Sith brings the prequel trilogy to a close and, ve...

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe - Opposite Lucille stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap. PART II: THE BUTTERFLY Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the mo...

The FollowUP: Disney's Jasmine and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Previously in this blog, I talked about how the aesthetics of the Disney Princess Brand have changed through the different iterations of Cinderella (read here ). Since then, Disney hasn't stopped rehashing and remaking its old animated classics. On the contrary, it has doubled down on this business model and its remakes have become more common, more widespread, and more successful. Since the 2015 remake of Cinderella , Disney has remade The Jungle Book (April 2016), Beauty and the Beast (March 2017), Dumbo (March 2019), Aladdin (May 2019), The Lion King (July 2019), Lady and the Tramp (November 2019), Mulan (scheduled for release July 2020) and Cruella (scheduled for release May 2021). Remakes for Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs , Pinocchio , The Little Mermaid , The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and Bambi are in development. Clearly, the live-action remake has become a staple of the brand and it cannot be ignored. Unfortunately. Seeing that this industry trend will not go any...

Moulin Rouge and the art of Kitsch

The spring of 2001 saw the release of Moulin Rouge! unexpectedly shake the movie industry and the box office simultaneously. Despite the many awards, including 8 nominations at the Academy Awards, and the impressive box office numbers, the movie quickly became very polarizing for audiences. Love and hate seemed to be the only two possible reactions to the movie itself. But that should not come as a surprise. The film was directed by Baz Luhrman, who has consistently been, throughout his career, one of the most polarizing filmmakers of his generation. I still have to meet anyone who simply doesn't mind his movies (which include Romeo+Juliet , Australia and The Great Gatsby ); it's either absolute love or absolute loathing. There is no middle ground with him. And that's mainly because he himself doesn't compromise when it comes to his style, which is so characteristic at this point (fast and frantic editing, vivid use of flashy colors and sparkle and stories a...