Skip to main content

Crimson Peak: Dressing Lady Lucille Sharpe. The Moth

"At home, we have only black moths.
Formidable creatures, to be sure, but they lack beauty.
They thrive on the dark and the cold."
- Lucille Sharpe -


CRIMSON PEAK is Guillermo del Toro's new film. Released this past October, the movie is written by del Toro himself and Mathew Robbins (who has also collaborated with the likes of Spielberg and Lucas throughout his career). The movie aims to be a gothic romance movie through and through, and it stars Mia Wasikowska, Tom Hiddleston and Jessica Chastain.

The story goes as follows: Edith Cushing, a young budding American author, meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming but impoverished English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak.

In the movie we find two opposing female characters: Edith Cushing (young, bright and filled with life) and Lady Lucille Sharpe (cold, calculating and as barren and death as the earth they stand on), which create a beautiful contrast with each other. As Lucille states at the beginning of the film; a moth and a butterfly.

And the way each of them dresses supports this difference. Kate Hawley (costume designer for PACIFIC RIM) did a spectacular job with the designs. But that's what any good wardrobe design should do, so what makes these specific designs worth talking about? Well, the fact that they follow the historically correct fashion more than many, but still manage to incorporate unique design elements that help build character. These are not fantasy designs where, literally, you can create the designs from scratch and make them to reflect the character as you see fit. These designs need to be true to the time period, which means that they need to have a certain shape and style, and because of these, the designer has to find more creative ways to bend and work with those shapes to fit the character.

To better explore these wonderful designs I'm going to split this post in two parts: this first one will be dedicated entirely to Lucille, and the next one will be dedicated to Edith.

PART I: THE MOTH


Lucille Sharpe is Thomas's older sister and lives with him in the family house. She's cold and frigid and a loner. She's emotionally distant, dominant and strong-willed. She, like the house, is rooted in the earth that saw her grow: scorched, famished and barren.

Lucille has, basically, four different costumes: the crimson silk frock, the black velvet frock, the blue velvet frock, and the nightgown.

Right off the bat, the first annotation on the designs: the movie takes place during the year 1901, but Kate Hawley took the decision (alongside Del Toro, obviously) to dress her character with outdated clothes. She's dressed to match the fashion of the 1880s. She's out of fashion by twenty years.

As seen here, the shape and consistency
of the dress is clearly distinctive.

This is actually a very clever decision. The Sharpe's are completely broke. They have no fortune left so their costumes (both hers and Thomas') are good quality dresses, but old and worn, showing that they don't have the money to buy new and more fashionable frocks. But that's only an aspect of it. There is also a character related issue behind the decision. Lucille is a character stuck in the past. She's dragged by it. So she dresses as if time had never passed.

The Crimson Silk Dress

The first time we're introduced to Lucille in the movie, she is wearing a gorgeous crimson silk dress with bustle and tail.


It's a rigid dress (just like the character) and it does so much to easily establishing her within the story. It's very significant that the first time you see her, she's dressed in the titular crimson.

Another significant aspect of the design is that, despite following the general shape of a real late Victorian gown, they designed the tail (by the material chosen and the use of pleads) to give a very specific contour that is much more dramatic than historic. So that when she is sitting at the piano, the tail resembles a pool of blood. Establishing her dangerous side.

That's the reason why the designer
named this frock as
"the drop of blood dress"

It's also relevant the fact that the back of the dress is designed to look like a human skeleton's spine. The idea was to underline the starvation and hunger she's gone through her life and how she's been defined by it. Through the way the dress is brought together, it gives the feeling that bones are protruding from her. She's a walking skeleton.


"It was about trying to feel like her spine; I was looking at pictures of starvation 
in the world of Allerdale. And Jessica’s a beautifully curvy woman if you see 
her in person, she’s actually quite voluptuous in a petite way, 
but I wanted to get that sense of bones so we did that with colors."
- Kate Hawley, costume designer -

The Black Velvet Dress

She wears this dress during the picnic at the park in Boston with Thomas and Edith. It's a black velvet day dress with very little bustle and no tail.


Like the rest of her dresses, this one is outdated. Its shape and general outline are clearly taken from the 1880s. And again, it's a very restricting dress. It's very sober, very depressing.

The design starts to incorporate elements from Allerdale and the dresses she'll wear later, as if every second that Edith spends with the Sharpe's, is dragging her a little closer to Allerdale and Lucille's grasp. It starts to incorporate the claw-like acorns that accompany all her dresses once she's already back in the house as well as the "dead leaves" garland. Again, underlining the dangerous and deathly side of her character.  But she's not yet back in Allerdale, and the red bright rose pinned on her chest is a clear reminder of that (and a call back to her previous frock).

The rose looks like a bloodstain
 on her dress

Actually, the garland worn here is exactly the same worn with the latter dresses, only here is placed differently. less menacingly at least.


It's a very visual design that helps maintain the ominous feel of her character.

The Blue Velvet Dress

This is the design she wears throughout most of the rest of the movie. She wears it for the first time when Edith first arrives into Allerdale Hall and through the whole second act of the movie until the last few scenes. It's a deep green-blue velvet dress with a small bustle (actually the size of the bustle gets bigger as the film progresses as if it were itself an umbilical cord attached to the house).


The main purpose of this design is to show her as part of the house and as a result of it as well. And because of this, both the color, the motifs and shapes echo the architecture of Allerdale Hall.

The material of the dress is thick velvet. This is a rather heavy material, it has weight and a rigidness to it that matches the house very well. The feel and texture of this specific velvet also underlines the viewer's perception of her as a moth, The house is filled with the insect motif. It's on the walls, it's on the floor and it's also covered with both dead and alive insects.


It's also a very constricting design (late Victorian dresses were much more constricting than those of the Edwardian fashion) that helps visualize certain aspects of the character. Lucille is somebody who has had to keep buried deep many of her feelings and her true nature. That psychological self-repression is externalized on the self-repression she inflicts on her body.

This is a character that hides behind a mask. That is underlined by the way she dresses.


The picture above is a frame from one of the movie's featurette, and it's actually a shame that this never made it into the movie itself. It shows that Lucille is wearing a real late Victorian corset. This is important in the sense that these types of corset went well below the hips, which meant that they were more constricting than prior types of corset. The usage of these corsets restricted a lot a woman's movement. This is key for a character who, essentially, is trying to keep it together in order not to break down completely. And so, by keeping herself constricted and tight, she keeps her mind that way as well. Again, a psychological trait is translated into costume.

Another important element of the design which is common to all the dresses mentioned before is the fact that her clothes always come all the way up to her neck. It covers her completely. And the same goes for the hair. Her hair is always pulled back very tightly, again, reinforcing that constraint and repression of the character.


In this design, we find again the garlands and claw-like acorns described in the Black dress. Only this time, there's even more of them. Now there aren't only on the front, there are also on the cuffs and on the chest, neck and back.




This garland of leaves and acorns encircles Lucille's dress like a vine that simultaneously protects and strangulates her. It's almost like the vegetation is growing out of the earth and twisting itself around her. As if she's slowly becoming part of the architecture.

As she says in the movie; she's tied to the house, she can't leave it. And that tie strengthens her and asphyxiates her at the same time.


“Lucille, who is absolutely tied to this house, says a line about how 
she can never leave this house. Looking out at a vine that is 
dead, she says, ‘Nothing grows here anymore.’ 
So we started making these leaves.” 
- Kate Hawley, costume designer -

The Nightgown

It's particularly hard to find good complete pictures of this design because she wears it only during the climax of the movie and that's entering into spoiler territory, so I'll do the best I can with my memory and the few pictures I've found.

This design consists of a white low neck flowing nightgown and a green silk, sleeveless robe with a crimson silk belt.


This design is remarkable at various levels. First and foremost, this is the only design where she appears without any kind of restriction: the hair very loosely done in a braid, no corset, no tight clothes.... she's, for lack of a better term, completely free.

It's only logical that she wears this look once Edith sees her as she truly is, without masks. And so, she also unmasks her body.


It's a gown design with movement in mind. She has to move a lot in it, and the way the robe and the gown were put together makes her movement so much beautiful. It allows us to see the beauty, as well as the danger, in her movement.


In regards to its design, it's a fairly simple gown. It's in this simplicity where lies its beauty.


"It’s one of those simple ones that sort of wasn’t hard to create, 
but it felt so right after all the constriction, the way we 
see her through the whole movie. Just to see 
Jessica [Chastain] in that, and the movement and things — 
it was one of my favorite garments."
- Kate Hawley, costume designer -

A black moth

What makes these designs great is its capacity to complement the character and its world in a very clever way. Its effect is very subconscious for the average viewer, but it's there nonetheless.

It helps to reinforce certain ideas about the character and her view of life. And to create contrast with our main character.


Where Lucille is all dark, heavy and tight, Edith is bright, light and flowing. Truly a moth and a butterfly.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoyed this article and would like to support the blog, 
consider buying me a Coffee? 💛💛

If you want more content like this, subscribe! Or come say hi on FacebookTumblrTwitterInstagram and help us grow!

DISCLAIMER: I claim no credit for images featured on this site unless noted. Visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners, and inclusion here is under fair use for criticism, comment, and news reporting purposes. If you own the rights to content here and wish it removed, please contact me.

Comments

  1. Hola,

    Alba, ¿me podrĂ­as decir quĂ© es lo que lleva Thomas Sharpe siempre en el cuello de la camisa? ¿Es una pajarita o un pañuelo?

    Muchas gracias de antemano, y felicidades por tu maravilloso blog. Lo he encontrado buscando cosillas de La cumbre escarlata y ha me he mirado un montĂłn de entradas. ¡Me encanta!

    Saludos desde España.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Buenas!

      Durante la mayoría de la película (excepto en la fiesta y el clímax final, si no me falla la memoria) Thomas lleva un pañuelo. No tengo ni idea como se dice exactamente en español, pero es lo que los ingles llaman una "cravat", que es el antecedente directo de la corbata moderna. Es un pañuelo atado (el como se ataba varia ligeramente segun la época). Te dejo algunas referencias:
      http://smg.photobucket.com/user/balletwench/media/The%20Fashion%20Historian/cravat91838.jpg.html
      https://janeaustensworld.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/bernier-ingres-1800.jpg

      Para el momento en que pasa la película, ese estilo de "cravat" ya estaba un poco fuera de moda. Pero Thomas, igual que Lucille va vestido con la moda de unos años antes (por la misma razon que ella, realmente).

      Espero que te sirva! Me alegro que te gusté el blog! Muchas gracias

      Saludos!

      Delete
  2. I LOVE THIS! I'm also looking for the night gown of Lucille cause I loved it so much, also your critic is really good - makes me wanna watch it again haha do you have any other sites aside from this blog?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! So glad you enjoyed it! Sadly, not anymore, I use to have a second blog dedicated to fantasy movies and literature, but I really didn't have the time to write for both, so I dropped it :/

      Delete
  3. Your articles are always so well-written and beautiful, I learn so much about costume design and finding meaning in the tiny details from reading your blog, please keep up the good work and never ever stop writing these!

    ReplyDelete
  4. the character went from pretty scary to pretty beautifully cool!

    ReplyDelete
  5. The blog is just wonderful and I'm so very glad that I stumbled upon it! After reading your article I have some questions, not sure if it's not a bit too outdated to get ansers though.
    I've just recently watched Crimson Peak and I remember being quite confused, as somebody slightly interested in historical fashion. The fact that Sharpes wear old clothing explains a lot, really, because one of my biggest concerns was seeing the huge, late 1890s sleeves, bustels and Edith's bal gown in the same movie. This dress especially seemed a bit out of place - it seems a bit modern for 1901 for me, am I mistaken, or it had it purpose too, somehow? Was such obviously edwardian dress appropriate for that year?
    The second question is about the corset Lucille is wearing - bare skine visible perfectly underneath it. Shouldnt victorian corsets be worn on some piece of chemise?

    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi! I'm sorry it took me two full years to answer. I've been disconnected from the blog for a good part of those two years... but now I'm Back!
      Hope it's not too late.
      The ball gown dress is, indeed, a tiny bit too modern. Just slightly.
      And yes, Lucille should be wearing a chemise beneath the corset. I usually hate when they do this, but in this case, it's clearly done to create the image of the corset marks on her skin when she takes it off... so I let it slide.
      Thank you for reading us and commenting! Cheers!

      Delete
  6. Hi
    I love your article, it's so full of details!
    I was looking to recreate the Nightgown, but I am inexperienced in fabrics, and I can't figure out what fabric was used for it! The only thing I was able to identify was the venise lace trim that is used at the top.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi! I'm glad you enjoyed the article!
      As for the fabric... I'm not a seamstress. I work concept not execution. So I won't be of much help. I guess it's silk but it's just a guess and I'm not 100% sure.
      I'm sorry..., but thank you for taking the time for reading and commenting!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good. The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right. Today, my goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for me to join the yelling contest, I guess. If I'm going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise. The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there. In the tales that the G

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs' main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume. But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous? To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed the 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But wh

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe - Opposite Lucille stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap. PART II: THE BUTTERFLY Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the mo

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex B

Love her or hate her, Padme and her costumes can never be far from our minds. They are too iconic, and probably one of the few memorable aspects of the prequels, so it's really fun to talk about them. And so, I've decided to continue what I started and focus on the costumes I left behind from Episode II . So let's dive back into it! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX B: THE ATTACK OF THE CLONES Episode II: The Attack of the Clones brings the character and her designs to a completely different level; she is not a queen anymore, which unfortunately means that she no longer has amazingly weird an

Marie Antoinette: Working with an historical basis

A couple of months ago, I talked extensively about the narrative aspect of the designs for 2006's  Marie Antoinette (see here ). But that's only one half of the story. This movie is, after all, a period piece, so let's have a look at how they translated that period into the costumes. MARIE ANTOINETTE : WORKING WITH AN HISTORICAL BASIS Period accurate pieces are actually the hardest to get by; that is because clothing in past centuries was way more complex and expensive than our 21st century standards. Because of this, most costume designers end up being constricted by their allotted budgets and have to make compromises with accuracy. This was not the case with this movie. Sofia Coppola's Marie Antoinette had a rather large budget, which allowed renowned designer Milena Canonero the freedom to create period-accurate pieces (the inaccuracies were only added for narrative purposes, not budget constrictions). Because of this, Canonero decided to work off

Moulin Rouge and the art of Kitsch

The spring of 2001 saw the release of Moulin Rouge! unexpectedly shake the movie industry and the box office simultaneously. Despite the many awards, including 8 nominations at the Academy Awards, and the impressive box office numbers, the movie quickly became very polarizing for audiences. Love and hate seemed to be the only two possible reactions to the movie itself. But that should not come as a surprise. The film was directed by Baz Luhrman, who has consistently been, throughout his career, one of the most polarizing filmmakers of his generation. I still have to meet anyone who simply doesn't mind his movies (which include Romeo+Juliet , Australia and The Great Gatsby ); it's either absolute love or absolute loathing. There is no middle ground with him. And that's mainly because he himself doesn't compromise when it comes to his style, which is so characteristic at this point (fast and frantic editing, vivid use of flashy colors and sparkle and stories a

The Costume Vault Anniversary!

Good day, beautiful readers!! First of all, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to everyone! Today is a very special day for me, here at The Costume Vault . It's our anniversary!!! We're celebrating our third anniversary! Though to be honest, I didn't actually start this project seriously until last year... So, I'm a three-year-old, with the experience of a one-year-old...? Oh, who cares. Today, three years ago, I published our first article ever. So, today is a day of celebration. This project started out of a deep love for movies and costuming and a need to share that. And also boredom... I had quite the free time back then, to be honest. But the project took off, and now I continue even when I don't have as much free time. But it's worth it because I get to share my love for movies and costuming with you. To this day, I've written sixty articles, most of which I am quite proud of indeed. And what's even better, you seem to enjoy reading

The Dressmaker. Part I: A glamorous outsider

2015's The Dressmaker is the wet dream of any costume lover in all of its 120 minutes of runtime. The Aussie film directed by Jocelyn Moorhouse is the adaptation of the Rosalie Ham's homonymous novel. After quite an impressive run in the Festival Circuit (it premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival) and garnishing numerous nominations and wins worldwide, it finally got a theatrical release, becoming a box office success and the 11th highest-grossing film of all time in its home country. So there certainly was a lot of hype around it when I finally got to see it and had a lot of expectations to live up to. ABOUT THE MOVIE So, is the movie actually that good? ... Sort of? Well, it's complicated. That's my official review tagline: it's complicated . The thing is; the movie has a ton of problems of all sorts. A lot of it doesn't work, but what does work, works really well. Let's start with the negatives. First of all, the movie is a t