Skip to main content

A look into Star Wars: Padme's dresses. Part VII

Our little journey through Padme's many dresses will continue with the "Purple Senate" Gown from Episode II.


Amidala wears this dress in Chancellor Palpatine's officer in the scene after there's been the attempt on her life. And again in a session of the Senate later in the movie.

The gown consists of a dark indigo bodice with a low-cut neck and skirt under a dark purple overcoat. The bodice is studded with beads and pearls along the neckline, and the front panel of the skirt and the sleeves are decorated with dark, beaded, scrollwork. The overcoat is decorated with intricate swirls and its shoulders are flared and decorated with beads.


The sleeves of the overcoat are long and have a slit through which the sleeves of the bodice show. The long ends of the sleeves are joined at the back with a metal circle decorated with pearls.

This design takes much from the same sources that the "packing gown" did. It's very western oriented, but it spices things a little bit more than the previous designs. The main structure of the dress takes again from 16th century European fashion. But this time, it's not English fashion, but Spanish Fashion.

Portrait of Isabel of Valois,
Queen of Spain (1565)

From the layering of the dress to the slit sleeves this type of dress is a clear inspiration for the design. Look at this historical gown dated 1598 and then look at Padme's gown.


The similarities are there, undoubtedly. The underdress-overdress structure, the long, open sleeves... The use of heavy fabric is also taken from this historical fashion trend, even though the patterns used on Amidala's dress have more in common with Art-Noveau than they do with 16th Century Spain.

Art-Noveau pattern
Amidala's gown pattern

But the design isn't exclusively 16th century Spain. The neckline is too low, and the waistline is softer, less angular. This softer, less severe shapes are taken from the late 19th century Imperial Russia.

Russian court dress (ca. 1900)

Here, the over dress never really closes, allowing you to see perfectly the bodice beneath and the underskirt, just as in Padme's design. And the type of embroidery is more similar to this style than to baroque fashion.

But the influences in this specific design are much more integrated than in other designs we've seen before. The neckline in the design is actually a mix between these two styles. The bodice's neckline is taken from the Russian dress, whilst the neck of the overdress is taken from the Spanish dress.


The hairstyle for this design is one of the most remembered in the second movie. For this look, they chose to style her hair in the shape of a cone, held in place with a golden headpiece. It's a severe look, yet regal.


The main influence behind the style is not European, but African. It's directly inspired by the Mangbetu tribe's practice of the Lipombo. The Lipombo is the custom of skull elongation, which was a status symbol among the ruling classes of the Mangbetu (an African tribe from the Congo).


The Mangbetu shaped their heads by wrapping tightly with cloth the heads of the babies. This created a distinctive appearance. The practice began dying out in the 1950's with the massive arrival of European settlers.


For Padme's design, they took the basic cone-like shape and turned it into the shape of the hairstyle, which in turn was encased by a golden cage-like structure inspired in the clothes used by the Mangbetu women.


The finishing touch on the design, though, is not the hairstyle this time; it's the wooden chocker she wears around her neck.


It's also African inspired, but it takes the basic structure from European pearl chokers. The only difference is the material and height, which is taken from African culture; mixing European jewelry with African textures.


This accessory wraps the design with a neat little bow, finishing one of the most interesting, cohesive and well-integrated design of the movie. This is the one I had the hardest time breaking apart its influences; that's because it manages to take from radically different sources and yet blend them into a unique design that stands on its own. Alien enough to belong to the Star Wars universe, but grounded enough to feel real.

The design is, for me, the definitive Senate Gown. It's very stern-looking and it brings to the character a certain gravitas that other dresses don't manage to bring in. It's rich, yet simple and graceful.

To see full scale:
https://www.pinterest.com/alba0531/a-look-into-star-wars-padmes-dresses/
If you want to browse through Padme's complete wardrobe you should 
check out this awesome site: Padawan's Guide


To read 
A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Part VIII click here.

Comments

  1. Man i want to pat that hair all day

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Marie Antoinette: Working with an historical basis

A couple of months ago, we talked extensively about the narrative aspect of the designs for the 2006's movie; Marie Antoinette (see here). But that's only one half of the story. This movie is, after all, a period piece, so let's have a look at how they translated that period into the costumes.

MARIE ANTOINETTE: WORKING WITH AN HISTORICAL BASIS Period accurate pieces are actually the hardest to get by; that is because clothing in past centuries was way more complex and expensive that our 21st century standards. Because of this, most costume designers end up being constricted by their allotted budgets and have to make compromises with the accuracy. This was not the case with this movie.
Sofia Coppola's Marie Anotinette had a rather large budget, which allowed renowned designer Milena Canonero the freedom to create period-accurate pieces (the inaccuracies were only added for narrative purposes not budget constrictions). Because of this, Canonero decided to work of actual …

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good.
The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right.
Today, our goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

This might n…

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have a real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume.
But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous?
To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But when these change…

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for us to join the yelling contest, I guess.
If we're going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise.

The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there.
In the tales that the Grimm Brothers…

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe -

Opposite Lucille, stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap.
PART II: THE BUTTERFLY



Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the movie.
The first and…