The 93rd Academy Awards Costume Design Nominations. Quick Recap

A couple of months later than usual due to this pandemic thing that has been messing with everyone's schedules, the nominations for this year's Academy Awards are finally out! And as is traditional in this blog, I'll do a quick recap of the nominees for Best Costume Design.

Before we start, just a brief disclaimer. This is neither a review of the nominees nor an actual essay. These are just my most honest thoughts about the movies they nominated this year for Costume Design, two of which I haven't managed to see yet. I might change my mind about them later when I get around to seeing them. It happens sometimes, and that's ok.

EMMA. Costume Design by Alexandra Byrne.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, Autumn de Wilde's directorial debut adaptation of Jane Austen's novel is the best period film I've seen in a while. It's joyful, charming, romantic, sexy and mean, all rolled in one. It also happens to be the best adaptation of Emma ever, period.

It certainly doesn't hurt that the costume design is just marvelous, both incredibly historically accurate and absolutely editorial. Byrne leans into the extravaganza of the period and uses color, shape, and texture to define the character and their place in the social ladder.

I completely fell in love with this movie and these designs and, not to be partisan, but I'll throw a fit if it doesn't win the Oscar for Best Costume Design. Though, to be honest, I don't think it will win. Alexandra Byrne is a 5 times nominated costume designer and has already won once ( for 2007's Elizabeth: The Golden age). In a year with so many first-time nominees in the category, I don't think they'll choose to give it to her a second time.

MA RAINEY'S BLACK BOTTOM. Costume Design by Ann Roth.

I have not seen this film as of yet, but I really want to see it. I truly do. I simply despise not being able to see films in theaters and that tends to translate into me postponing seeing movies directly released on Netflix or other platforms for as long as possible. I'm such an idiot, I know.

So, unfortunately, I don't really have a solid opinion on the designs to share with you. From what I've seen, it looks damn good. The movie takes place in 1927, and it seems to take full advantage of the period fashion. All in all, I'm not surprised to see it has been nominated.

On the other hand, the costume designer, Ann Roth, has already 4 nominations and a win for 1996's The English Patient, so, just like Emma, I don't think it's going to win.

But I'm really happy it's nominated, and I'm excited to watch it.

MANK. Costume Design by Trish Summerville.

David Fincher's noir homage to the Golden Age of Hollywood is both classic and yet extremely modern. A tale apparently about the creative process that slowly but surely reveals itself to be a poignant commentary on the power storytelling has to shape public consciousness and affect real political change, much too often for the worse. It's a really good movie.

On the other hand, its costume design is a very functional one. It serves to set the period and it does its job pretty damn good, but it doesn't call attention to itself. It mostly consists of an endless parade of suits with the odd gorgeous 1930s gown thrown on Marion Davis' character. So it's not really my favorite costume design out there. It's really not my cup of tea.

Don't get me wrong, it's a well-deserved nomination, but it's making me dread having to review it.

As for its odds in the competition, well, it's Trish Summerville's first nomination, and Mank is the most nominated movie of the year, so I'd say it has a good chance to win.

MULAN. Costume Design by Bina Daigeler.

Why does this keep happening to me? I have written a lot about how much I hate these remakes and their aesthetic and design choices. So why do they keep popping up? Can't they just go away?

On a more serious note, it's truly an awful movie where every single change and departure from the original story fails to work and only manages to destroy any emotional connection and reliability the story and the character had. Funny that, in trying to make the movie explicitly and textually more feminist than the original, they made it less so.

It also doesn't help that it feels incredibly white in the worst way possible. Because, just as with Aladdin, they did have an all Asian cast, but a completely white creative team, and so the story is populated by essentially western tropes of the fantasy genre (witches, dark magic, duels to the death...) that do not resonate or reflect Chinese culture at all.

This "cultural inauthenticity" is also all over the costume design. It's what happens when you decide that the best option to design the costumes for a Chinese legend is a German designer who has lived for 40 years in Spain.

The main problem for me is that it reads as very western. It relies on stereotypes and preconceived notions that keep the designs from being unique and well-fitted for the story. They also happen to be very ugly, particularly the designs for the beginning of the film, when she's still in her village.

This is a very experienced designer, don't get me wrong. She has worked with Pedro Almodovar and Jim Jarmush. And she recently did the designs for the amazing Mrs. America, so she's more than capable of creating compelling designs. She's just not the right person for this project.

So yes, I feel this nomination is completely unfair and undeserved. Unfortunately, it's also a first-time nomination for Bina Daigeler and it's a big Disney production, so it has a chance to actually win. And oh boy, does that piss me off.

PINOCCHIO. Costume Design by Massino Cantini Parrini.

I'm not exaggerating when I say that I did not even know this movie existed before the nominations came out. So no, I have not seen it. I have seen the trailer though, and It looks terrifying in the worst kind of way. I would have preferred to remain blissfully ignorant of its existence, thank you very much.

But, as for the costume design, it looks interesting enough. That's my assessment based on the trailer. Still, one never knows, and now I have to see it to actually form an opinion. Damm you Academy.

In this case, the costume designer is also a first-time nominee, but contending against a Disney production and the most nominated film of the night, it has no chances to actually take the award home.

TO SUM IT UP

I think it's quite a good year for this category. I only feel like there's one completely undeserved nomination, so it's a step up.

I would personally give it to Emma, but I think it will go either to Mank or to Mulan. If they want to shake things up, maybe it'll go to Ma Rainey's Black Bottom. What is sure, is that there is no way in hell the award will go to Pinocchio.

P.D: If it does go to Pinocchio, it will be very funny and I will prove to the world how lousy I am at predicting these things.

ABOUT THAT ANNUAL OSCAR RETROSPECTIVE...

I am very much aware that I have not finished the retrospective for the 2018 nominees, and I did not even begin the retrospective for the 2019 nominees. So I will put it out there and warn you that I am not sure if I'll do a retrospective for this year's nominees.

Basically, I have conflicting feelings about this series of articles. On the one side, it's cool to review each year's nominees. On the other hand, it forces me to review movies that I wouldn't normally review and forces me into the position of writing about designs where I literally have nothing to say. It has happened repeatedly and it is just painful. It stresses me out because I just don't feel comfortable publishing an article that basically amounts to "I have nothing say" and so I push myself to write and I end up frustrated and angry at myself and that makes me not want to write... and this blog should be fun. For you and for me.

So I'm not sure what I'll do this year.

Thanks for understanding and supporting me always.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoyed this article and would like to support the blog,

consider buying me a Coffee? 💛💛

If you want more content like this, subscribe! Or come say hi on Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, Instagram and help us grow!

DISCLAIMER: I claim no credit for images featured on this site unless noted. Visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners, and inclusion here is under fair use for criticism, comment, and news reporting purposes. If you own the rights to content here and wish it removed, please contact me.

Comments

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good. The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right. Today, my goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex B

Love her or hate her, Padme and her costumes can never be far from our minds. They are too iconic, and probably one of the few memorable aspects of the prequels, so it's really fun to talk about them. And so, I've decided to continue what I started and focus on the costumes I left behind from Episode II . So let's dive back into it! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX B: THE ATTACK OF THE CLONES Episode II: The Attack of the Clones brings the character and her designs to a completely different level; she is not a queen anymore, which unfortunately means that she no longer has amazingly weird an

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs' main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume. But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous? To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed the 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But wh

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for me to join the yelling contest, I guess. If I'm going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise. The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there. In the tales that the G

Why Oh Why? Peaky Blinders and the mystery of Grace's Crappy Hair

There are many unanswered questions out there. Many, many mysteries that will never be unraveled. But amongst those, the one that keeps me up at night is why was Grace's hair so crappy during the first season of Peaky Blinders ? Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Peaky Blinders . I'm human, believe it or not. I've watched all its five seasons (twice) and I'm impatiently waiting for its sixth season with bated breath. And I can vouch for it: it's a quality show. Good storytelling, good acting, great photography... and for the most part, great character design both in costume design and hair and makeup. That's why I'm still baffled by the decision of having Grace's character sporting what amounts to limp California Beach Waves for the whole of the first season. Because, while it is true that the first season had a considerably lower budget than its following installments, a shitty approach to historical accuracy wasn't the general tone for the

Cleopatra or the Most Undeserved Oscar Win ever

There is a reason why I usually do not review movies from the "golden age" of Hollywood (which means any movie prior to the 1970s), and that is because back then they cared even less about historical accuracy in costuming than nowadays, which is saying a lot. Because of this, most of the "historical" movies generally ignored the period and just did whatever was fashionable at the time with a spice of the supposed period. This is something that usually makes me laugh, rather than angry, because it results in very funny outfits (peplums particularly created a lot of funny imaginary). And Cleopatra , 1963's epic about the Egyptian queen, was for most of my childhood one of those movies. I knew the costumes were not accurate, but they fascinated me anyways in their ridiculousness. That is until I heard that the movie had won an Academy Award for Best Achievement in Costume Design, the same year that " Il Gattopardo was nominated for Best Costume Design. A

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex C

It's been a while, but I always come back to her in the end. Padmé Amidala, from the Star Wars Prequels, is a Style Icon and my personal standout from the mess that Episode I to III ended up being. Because of it, I've decided it was time to finish what I started so long ago and finally address Episode III . It took me long enough. So let's dive back into it for one last chance to love, hate, snark and bark at the astonishing monstrosity that is Padmé's Wardrobe! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX C: REVENGE OF THE SITH Episode III: Revenge of the Sith brings the prequel trilogy to a close and, ve

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe - Opposite Lucille stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap. PART II: THE BUTTERFLY Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the mo

The FollowUP: Disney's Jasmine and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Previously in this blog, I talked about how the aesthetics of the Disney Princess Brand have changed through the different iterations of Cinderella (read here ). Since then, Disney hasn't stopped rehashing and remaking its old animated classics. On the contrary, it has doubled down on this business model and its remakes have become more common, more widespread, and more successful. Since the 2015 remake of Cinderella , Disney has remade The Jungle Book (April 2016), Beauty and the Beast (March 2017), Dumbo (March 2019), Aladdin (May 2019), The Lion King (July 2019), Lady and the Tramp (November 2019), Mulan (scheduled for release July 2020) and Cruella (scheduled for release May 2021). Remakes for Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs , Pinocchio , The Little Mermaid , The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and Bambi are in development. Clearly, the live-action remake has become a staple of the brand and it cannot be ignored. Unfortunately. Seeing that this industry trend will not go any

Moulin Rouge and the art of Kitsch

The spring of 2001 saw the release of Moulin Rouge! unexpectedly shake the movie industry and the box office simultaneously. Despite the many awards, including 8 nominations at the Academy Awards, and the impressive box office numbers, the movie quickly became very polarizing for audiences. Love and hate seemed to be the only two possible reactions to the movie itself. But that should not come as a surprise. The film was directed by Baz Luhrman, who has consistently been, throughout his career, one of the most polarizing filmmakers of his generation. I still have to meet anyone who simply doesn't mind his movies (which include Romeo+Juliet , Australia and The Great Gatsby ); it's either absolute love or absolute loathing. There is no middle ground with him. And that's mainly because he himself doesn't compromise when it comes to his style, which is so characteristic at this point (fast and frantic editing, vivid use of flashy colors and sparkle and stories a

The costume vault

Search This Blog