Skip to main content

A look into Star Wars: Padme's dresses. Part VIII

The "Tatooine" outfit from Attack of the Clones is possibly one of the less cohesive designs within the Star Wars universe. And, funny enough, that's why I'm dedicating this new entry to it.


She wears this outfit during her visit to Tatooine with Anakin. First when they go to Mos Espa and then when they arrive at Owen's house.

The outfit consists of a very light blue midriff dress with silver embroidery. The top is wrapped around her, with wide, loose sleeves that turn into a cape behind her. The hem of the cape is decorated with silver motifs. The pants are wide and loose and are accessorized with a tightly drawn, sash-like top at the waist, which is decorated with a silver beaded pendant with a sash hanging from it.


With this, she wears a full-length, large-cowled cloak. It's done with indigo material, with abstract embossed patterns. It's clasped with a simple, curling clasp studded with beads.

This is not one of the most remembered costumes in the movie, but I think it's an interesting one to break down.

The influences for this design are pretty unexpected when compared to the previous designs. The fact that it's a two-piece costume screams loudly of 20th-century influences, which is a far cry away from the other designs.

For starters, the top clearly resembles a 90's crop top, at least in length. And the presence of a midriff is also a clear call back to 90's fashion.


Short tops and uncovered midriffs are essential to the 90's look and are very recognizable. This is one of the things that make this design feel weird amongst the rest of the designs. All of the other designs I've covered so far focussed on mostly historical influences pre-dating the 19th century, which always gave me the idea that in Padme's culture, women do not go around showing much skin. Because of this, suddenly seeing her belly always seemed wrong for the universe.

But the design doesn't only feed from 1990's fashion; it also takes from 1970's fashion. The so-called bell-bottom pants became wildly popular during the decade, and this type of wide trousers became very identifiable as a symbol itself, being popularized again during the early 2000s.


These types of pants are pretty similar to the ones worn by Padme in this design.


Another element taken from the '70s is the shape of the sleeves. These wide bell-shaped sleeves were also very characteristic of the '70s.


And just to wrap the 70's section, this Cher outfit looks pretty similar to Padme's outfit. The waistline of the pants is practically identical.


And from the 1970's and 1990's American fashion to traditional Indian Fashion.


The two-piece structure is also reminiscent of the traditional Indian Sari; especially the type of fabric used and the tightly-drawn sash-like top at the waist of the pants. Of course, there are many differences, and it's more of a flair than a proper influence.

If we turn to the design of the cloak, the influences are more African oriented. The way the hood frames her face is pretty reminiscent of the traditional garb for Yemenese and Libyan brides.

Yemeni Bride
Lybian Bride

Padme's design is a simplified version of these traditional costumes; there is no jewelry and almost no colors aside from the indigo. It's only logical, as she's supposed to be in disguise.


The design also takes some ideas from the traditional costume of the Sahara cultures. Again, it's a logical choice; Tatooine is supposed to be a desert planet.



These pictures show the Tuareg traditional costume. The color palette of Padme's design seems taken from there though they chose to use a less vibrant blue.

As for the patterns and decorations, the design goes back to the default influence to those throughout the movie: art nouveau.


The motifs, the cloak's clasp and the sash decoration are clear callbacks to art nouveau, just like in the packing dress and the purple senate gown.


This art nouveau's pattern has a lot in common with the patterns in Padme's outfit, as well as those in the cloak.


And look at the encrusted jewels drawn here; the resemblance with the jewels encrusted in the sash is uncanny.

The design is topped by a hairstyle that we've already seen in Padme before. It consists of two buns on the side of her head with the rest of her hair hanging down. This is decorated with an intricate, delicate metal headpiece. 


It's a less complicated version of the picnic gown hairstyle, with something of the packing gown hairstyle.

Picnic Gown Hairstyle

Packing Gown Hairstyle

The two side buns are very reminiscent of the ones she wore with the picnic gown; being a simpler take on the medieval crispinette.


In this design she wears no fish-net to keep the buns in place, creating a more relaxed feel. She's in the middle of nowhere, and so she styles herself with less pomp and everything flows more loosely.

Just as in the picnic design, she wears the rest of her hair loose. But this time is collected in a messy ponytail. In the environment she finds herself is only logical to keep the hair in a ponytail, instead of having it flying around.


The topping detail of the design is the metallic headpiece; it's very similar to what she wears in the packing gown design. That's because both pieces take inspiration from art nouveau's jewelry.


The main problem with this design is that it is not coherent with the rest of her wardrobe. it doesn't feel like it belongs in the Star Wars universe, much less that it belongs to this character. It's beautiful, yes, but it's not her.

Whilst most of the designs have a coherent base of influences (the queen look uses Asian influence, and the senator look uses Baroque European influences) this design totally jumps the shark and uses the American 70's and 90's as a base, giving it a completely different look that doesn't fit in.

If we add the fact that the original trilogy already showed us the "Tatooine" look and it has nothing to do with this (except perhaps the color), this makes for a completely incoherent design.

The cloak and the hair are somehow coherent, but the dress just feels as if they wanted to show Natalie Portman's midriff. The character, as we've been shown until now, would never wear something this revealing; she's always dressed in delicate and beautiful dresses, but never this revealing.

And to me, that detracts from the beauty of the design. No matter how gorgeous it is, if it doesn't fit the movie or the character, it shouldn't be there.

To see full scale:
https://www.pinterest.com/alba0531/a-look-into-star-wars-padmes-dresses/

To read A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Part IX click here.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoyed this article and would like to support the blog, 
consider buying me a Coffee? 💛💛

If you want more content like this, subscribe! Or come say hi on FacebookTumblrTwitterInstagram and help us grow!

DISCLAIMER: I claim no credit for images featured on this site unless noted. Visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners, and inclusion here is under fair use for criticism, comment, and news reporting purposes. If you own the rights to content here and wish it removed, please contact me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good. The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right. Today, my goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex B

Love her or hate her, Padme and her costumes can never be far from our minds. They are too iconic, and probably one of the few memorable aspects of the prequels, so it's really fun to talk about them. And so, I've decided to continue what I started and focus on the costumes I left behind from Episode II . So let's dive back into it! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX B: THE ATTACK OF THE CLONES Episode II: The Attack of the Clones brings the character and her designs to a completely different level; she is not a queen anymore, which unfortunately means that she no longer has amazingly weird an

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs' main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume. But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous? To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed the 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But wh

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for me to join the yelling contest, I guess. If I'm going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise. The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there. In the tales that the G

Why Oh Why? Peaky Blinders and the mystery of Grace's Crappy Hair

There are many unanswered questions out there. Many, many mysteries that will never be unraveled. But amongst those, the one that keeps me up at night is why was Grace's hair so crappy during the first season of Peaky Blinders ? Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Peaky Blinders . I'm human, believe it or not. I've watched all its five seasons (twice) and I'm impatiently waiting for its sixth season with bated breath. And I can vouch for it: it's a quality show. Good storytelling, good acting, great photography... and for the most part, great character design both in costume design and hair and makeup. That's why I'm still baffled by the decision of having Grace's character sporting what amounts to limp California Beach Waves for the whole of the first season.  Because, while it is true that the first season had a considerably lower budget than its following installments, a shitty approach to historical accuracy wasn't the general tone for the

Cleopatra or the Most Undeserved Oscar Win ever

There is a reason why I usually do not review movies from the "golden age" of Hollywood (which means any movie prior to the 1970s), and that is because back then they cared even less about historical accuracy in costuming than nowadays, which is saying a lot. Because of this, most of the "historical" movies generally ignored the period and just did whatever was fashionable at the time with a spice of the supposed period. This is something that usually makes me laugh, rather than angry, because it results in very funny outfits (peplums particularly created a lot of funny imaginary). And Cleopatra , 1963's epic about the Egyptian queen, was for most of my childhood one of those movies. I knew the costumes were not accurate, but they fascinated me anyways in their ridiculousness. That is until I heard that the movie had won an Academy Award for Best Achievement in Costume Design, the same year that " Il Gattopardo  was nominated for Best Costume Design. A

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex C

It's been a while, but I always come back to her in the end. Padmé Amidala, from the Star Wars Prequels, is a Style Icon and my personal standout from the mess that Episode I to III ended up being. Because of it, I've decided it was time to finish what I started so long ago and finally address Episode III . It took me long enough.  So let's dive back into it for one last chance to love, hate, snark and bark at the astonishing monstrosity that is Padmé's Wardrobe! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX C: REVENGE OF THE SITH Episode III: Revenge of the Sith brings the prequel trilogy to a close and, ve

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe - Opposite Lucille stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap. PART II: THE BUTTERFLY Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the mo

The FollowUP: Disney's Jasmine and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Previously in this blog, I talked about how the aesthetics of the Disney Princess Brand have changed through the different iterations of Cinderella (read here ). Since then, Disney hasn't stopped rehashing and remaking its old animated classics. On the contrary, it has doubled down on this business model and its remakes have become more common, more widespread, and more successful. Since the 2015 remake of Cinderella , Disney has remade The Jungle Book (April 2016), Beauty and the Beast (March 2017), Dumbo (March 2019), Aladdin (May 2019), The Lion King (July 2019), Lady and the Tramp (November 2019), Mulan (scheduled for release July 2020) and Cruella (scheduled for release May 2021). Remakes for Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs , Pinocchio , The Little Mermaid , The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and Bambi are in development. Clearly, the live-action remake has become a staple of the brand and it cannot be ignored. Unfortunately. Seeing that this industry trend will not go any

Moulin Rouge and the art of Kitsch

The spring of 2001 saw the release of Moulin Rouge! unexpectedly shake the movie industry and the box office simultaneously. Despite the many awards, including 8 nominations at the Academy Awards, and the impressive box office numbers, the movie quickly became very polarizing for audiences. Love and hate seemed to be the only two possible reactions to the movie itself. But that should not come as a surprise. The film was directed by Baz Luhrman, who has consistently been, throughout his career, one of the most polarizing filmmakers of his generation. I still have to meet anyone who simply doesn't mind his movies (which include Romeo+Juliet , Australia and The Great Gatsby ); it's either absolute love or absolute loathing. There is no middle ground with him. And that's mainly because he himself doesn't compromise when it comes to his style, which is so characteristic at this point (fast and frantic editing, vivid use of flashy colors and sparkle and stories a