Skip to main content

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Part I

I’ve decided to start this blog by dedicating the first posts to the designs of Padme Amidala’s dresses in the first three episodes of Star Wars. Although  I’m not particularly fond of these movies, I have to give some credit to their wardrobe design and the thought and creativity that went into it. 

I will look into the most iconic dresses of Padme Amidala and do a breakdown of the influences behind them. Each post will be dedicated to one of these dresses.

The first one of these series is the one I like to call the “Red Invasion” gown. It’s featured the first time we see Natalie Portman’s character in The Phantom Menace, and it’s probably one of the most iconic gowns she has.


This gown is made of embroidered silk and faux fur that lines the double collar, tabards, double sleeves and hem. The alien-like touch is given to the dress by the electric lights placed on the skirt, that are made to resemble ladybugs.

The headpiece that accompanies this dress is also pretty iconic in and on itself, be it due to its size or uniqueness, I cannot say.

Before I start with the historical/ cultural influences, I’d like to point out that this dress takes a lot from a dress from the 1944 movie: “Cobra woman” by Maria Montez.


As you can see, the structure of the dress is the same, and so is the color. Both are deep red with golden embroidery and a very prominent and large headpiece. It is very difficult to deny the resemblance. Could it be a coincidence? Yes. Is it that likely? No. Whether it was a conscious inspiration or not, it cannot be denied that the Amidala dress takes a hell of a lot from this 1944 movie.

Besides that obvious resemblance, this dress takes inspiration from other sources as well; mainly from the traditional clothing of some Asian cultures, such as China and Japan.

For starters: the coloration of this dress is clearly based on the more traditional dresses of the Chinese nobility. But the heaviness of the dress (it looks pretty consisted and layered), as well as the use of fur, is clearly taken from Tibet and Mongolia, rather than China. The main difference between the two is how thick the clothes are, What we understand as Chinese clothing generally consists in silks and very thin and flowing dresses (like those featured in Zhang Yimou’s movies). Tibetan and Mongolian clothes are thicker, made for a colder and less gentle environment.


And the shoulder piece of this dress actually reminds me a lot of this gown in "The Last Emperor". It's just a detail, but I thought it was worth mentioning.



The headdress is almost as important as the dress itself. Most Asian cultures, traditionally tend to go for huge hairstyles, heavily decorated and with huge volume. That is exactly what Amidala’s headdress is aiming for. And it certainly succeeds. The golden “hat” that surrounds the face and the hair sort of reminds me of the imperial Chinese hats, especially the top of it. 


On the other hand, the hair roll surrounding it is more Japanese than Chinese. The traditional Chinese hairstyles tend to put the hair flat on their heads and add huge headdresses on top of it. 


On the contrary, the traditional Japanese hairstyles (or the more known at least) base themselves on creating volume from the root of the hair by using hair rolls (very similar to the one she wears, although not quite so exaggerated).


Another traditional aspect of Japanese hairstyles, especially in royalty, is the creation of a long tail of hair descending down the back. This, as we can see, it’s also used in the design of Amidala’s hair. Although in her case it’s clearly more exaggerated since there are at least six strands of twisted hair falling down instead of one.


The final touch to the dress is the makeup. This is very recognizable in itself because she wears the same every time she appears as the Queen. That’s why we come to associate the role of Queen of Naboo with that makeup. And in the next movies, when she is no longer queen, we see that she stops using it. We also see the following Queens use it, so it is clearly marked that this makeup is unique to the Queen.

The design of it consists of white painted skin with only a touch of color: the red-painted lips and the two red dots on her cheeks.


This design actually takes a lot from the traditional geisha makeup. Although it avoids any kind of makeup in the eyes, which most geishas would use, and only paints the upper lip, leaving most of the other lip white.


This agglomeration of influences creates a very peculiar look for her character and establish a very strong culture behind it.

That is why it’s a real pity that a movie with such a good production design couldn’t be as good as every fan wanted it to be. In my opinion is an incredible waste of resources and creativity from the art department considering how bad these movies are.


To see at full scale:
https://www.pinterest.com/alba0531/a-look-into-star-wars-padmes-dresses/

To read A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Part II click here.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoyed this article and would like to support the blog, 
consider buying me a Coffee? 💛💛

If you want more content like this, subscribe! Or come say hi on FacebookTumblrTwitterInstagram and help us grow!

DISCLAIMER: I claim no credit for images featured on this site unless noted. Visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners, and inclusion here is under fair use for criticism, comment, and news reporting purposes. If you own the rights to content here and wish it removed, please contact me.

Comments

  1. Here are 2 details you missed out on the makeup:

    1. The 2 dots are based on the traditional Korean bridal makeup "yeonji gonji" (연지곤지): usually one red dot on each cheek, sometimes a 3rd located on the center of the forehead, they are either composed of safflower makeup or small pieces of red paper circles, and they symbolize either the bride's youth and virginity, or a charm to chase away evil spirits and keep the wedding sacred.

    2. The "Scar of Remembrance" lip makeup of Naboo royalty was based on the Manchu women's lip makeup during the Qing Dynasty: the upper lip was fully painted, while the lower lip was only painted in the center.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was looking at old portraits of women in history and I found one that looks like a direct reference to the costume, I can't post the pic here but the link https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-roBTQoh-WPo/V4W_pSS2XWI/AAAAAAAAcXs/b-_FKYvrnQUuNCGfgKPkRU4lX2DLKL6jQCLcB/s1600/Mongolian%2BWomen%2Bin%2BTheir%2BTraditional%2BCostumes%2B%252821%2529.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  5. I was interested to find this blog, because I'd just seen a picture of The Cobra Woman costume and compared how similar it was to Queen Amidala's outfit. So I did a quick search to see if it was deliberate and found this reference. I'm glad to see someone else noticed the likeness, too!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good. The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right. Today, my goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex B

Love her or hate her, Padme and her costumes can never be far from our minds. They are too iconic, and probably one of the few memorable aspects of the prequels, so it's really fun to talk about them. And so, I've decided to continue what I started and focus on the costumes I left behind from Episode II . So let's dive back into it! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX B: THE ATTACK OF THE CLONES Episode II: The Attack of the Clones brings the character and her designs to a completely different level; she is not a queen anymore, which unfortunately means that she no longer has amazingly weird an

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for me to join the yelling contest, I guess. If I'm going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise. The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there. In the tales that the G

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs' main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume. But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous? To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed the 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But wh

Why Oh Why? Peaky Blinders and the mystery of Grace's Crappy Hair

There are many unanswered questions out there. Many, many mysteries that will never be unraveled. But amongst those, the one that keeps me up at night is why was Grace's hair so crappy during the first season of Peaky Blinders ? Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Peaky Blinders . I'm human, believe it or not. I've watched all its five seasons (twice) and I'm impatiently waiting for its sixth season with bated breath. And I can vouch for it: it's a quality show. Good storytelling, good acting, great photography... and for the most part, great character design both in costume design and hair and makeup. That's why I'm still baffled by the decision of having Grace's character sporting what amounts to limp California Beach Waves for the whole of the first season.  Because, while it is true that the first season had a considerably lower budget than its following installments, a shitty approach to historical accuracy wasn't the general tone for the

Cleopatra or the Most Undeserved Oscar Win ever

There is a reason why I usually do not review movies from the "golden age" of Hollywood (which means any movie prior to the 1970s), and that is because back then they cared even less about historical accuracy in costuming than nowadays, which is saying a lot. Because of this, most of the "historical" movies generally ignored the period and just did whatever was fashionable at the time with a spice of the supposed period. This is something that usually makes me laugh, rather than angry, because it results in very funny outfits (peplums particularly created a lot of funny imaginary). And Cleopatra , 1963's epic about the Egyptian queen, was for most of my childhood one of those movies. I knew the costumes were not accurate, but they fascinated me anyways in their ridiculousness. That is until I heard that the movie had won an Academy Award for Best Achievement in Costume Design, the same year that " Il Gattopardo  was nominated for Best Costume Design. A

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe - Opposite Lucille stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap. PART II: THE BUTTERFLY Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the mo

The FollowUP: Disney's Jasmine and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Previously in this blog, I talked about how the aesthetics of the Disney Princess Brand have changed through the different iterations of Cinderella (read here ). Since then, Disney hasn't stopped rehashing and remaking its old animated classics. On the contrary, it has doubled down on this business model and its remakes have become more common, more widespread, and more successful. Since the 2015 remake of Cinderella , Disney has remade The Jungle Book (April 2016), Beauty and the Beast (March 2017), Dumbo (March 2019), Aladdin (May 2019), The Lion King (July 2019), Lady and the Tramp (November 2019), Mulan (scheduled for release July 2020) and Cruella (scheduled for release May 2021). Remakes for Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs , Pinocchio , The Little Mermaid , The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and Bambi are in development. Clearly, the live-action remake has become a staple of the brand and it cannot be ignored. Unfortunately. Seeing that this industry trend will not go any

Moulin Rouge and the art of Kitsch

The spring of 2001 saw the release of Moulin Rouge! unexpectedly shake the movie industry and the box office simultaneously. Despite the many awards, including 8 nominations at the Academy Awards, and the impressive box office numbers, the movie quickly became very polarizing for audiences. Love and hate seemed to be the only two possible reactions to the movie itself. But that should not come as a surprise. The film was directed by Baz Luhrman, who has consistently been, throughout his career, one of the most polarizing filmmakers of his generation. I still have to meet anyone who simply doesn't mind his movies (which include Romeo+Juliet , Australia and The Great Gatsby ); it's either absolute love or absolute loathing. There is no middle ground with him. And that's mainly because he himself doesn't compromise when it comes to his style, which is so characteristic at this point (fast and frantic editing, vivid use of flashy colors and sparkle and stories a

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex C

It's been a while, but I always come back to her in the end. Padmé Amidala, from the Star Wars Prequels, is a Style Icon and my personal standout from the mess that Episode I to III ended up being. Because of it, I've decided it was time to finish what I started so long ago and finally address Episode III . It took me long enough.  So let's dive back into it for one last chance to love, hate, snark and bark at the astonishing monstrosity that is Padmé's Wardrobe! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX C: REVENGE OF THE SITH Episode III: Revenge of the Sith brings the prequel trilogy to a close and, ve