Skip to main content

Marie Antoinette: Working with an historical basis

A couple of months ago, we talked extensively about the narrative aspect of the designs for the 2006's movie; Marie Antoinette (see here). But that's only one half of the story. This movie is, after all, a period piece, so let's have a look at how they translated that period into the costumes.


Period accurate pieces are actually the hardest to get by; that is because clothing in past centuries was way more complex and expensive that our 21st century standards. Because of this, most costume designers end up being constricted by their allotted budgets and have to make compromises with the accuracy. This was not the case with this movie.

Sofia Coppola's Marie Anotinette had a rather large budget, which allowed renowned designer Milena Canonero the freedom to create period-accurate pieces (the inaccuracies were only added for narrative purposes not budget constrictions). Because of this, Canonero decided to work of actual historical dresses and then alter and adjust them according to the narrative guidelines she had.

The obvious starting point, in this case, it's the actual contemporary portraits of the Marie Antoinette herself.

Portrait of a young Marie Antoinette

This portrait is one of the most famous portraits depicting the young bride, dated around the 1770's. This was must have been used, more than certainly, as inspiration for the blue dress with pink bows she wears very early on in the movie.

The neckline is practically identical, as is the color combination of blue and pink and the little choker. But it also takes inspiration from the Versailles' fashion of the time and changes the placement of the bows from the sleeves and choker (as it's in the portrait) to the stomacher, as seen in the portrait below.

Portrait de Madame Lalive de Jully,
dated around 1764

Another portrait that had to be an inspiration to the designer was this simple portrait of a very young Marie Antoinette (dated from before she married).

This peach-colored gown shows up in almost identical form in the movie itself. It's this kind of commitment to period that makes the designs for this movie so great.

Let's look now at the wedding and coronation gowns, which we barely talked about in the previous article.

Wedding design
Coronation design

In both designs, she's wearing wide panniers under the skirt, creating this elongated shape that is so very associated with the 18th century. A lot of people have wrongfully complained to me that only these two dresses use them. Because of this, allow me to recap with a short history of the panniers: Panniers or side hoops were women's undergarments worn by women in the 17th and 18th centuries to to create a skirt shape that was wide at the side while leaving the front and back relatively flat. This style originated in Spanish court fashion around the mid-17th century and was made familiar through the portraits of the Spanish Royal Family by Velázquez. Around 1718-19, the fashion started to spread through France and later to the rest of Europe. By the mid-18th century, panniers were the high fashion at Versailles, and at the most extreme, panniers got to extend the skirt several feet on each side.

But, by the 1780s, wide panniers were relegated to high-court etiquette and would have only been worn in very strict occasions, such as a wedding or a coronation, being called "court dress". And so, the fact the costume designer chose to only use panniers for these specific designs, shows how much attention to detail was put into the designs.

For proof this, look at the portrait below. Any portrait that you find of Marie Antoinette wearing wide panniers will be specifically marked as Marie Antoinette in court dress.

Marie Antoinette in a court dress
by Louise Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun (1778).

Leaving historical considerations aside, I really think this costume was the main inspiration for both dresses; especially when looking at the bodice and sleeves of the wedding dress and comparing it to the portrait above.

The day to day fashion during most of her reign (for noble women, of course) is very well captured by another of Vigée Le Brun's iconic portraits of the Queen.

This style of gown, widely known as Robe a l'Anglaise was widespread in Europe as common use dress for women, and would have been what Marie Antoinette wore on a day-to-day basis. Because of this, many of the movie's gowns are influenced by said style.

This was a very popular style throughout most of her reign, and it's easy to find many portraits of the time showing similar gowns.

Another portrait that seems to be an influence for the costumes is this other painting by Louise Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun, dated around 1783.

This depiction of the queen was, at the time, really controversial, for it showed the Queen in a very unofficial and unorthodox way. She's wearing a chemise, a new style of softer, lighter dresses popularized by Marie Antoinette in the 1780's and that would come to be known as Robe a la Reine.

The distinctive elements of this style are the white muslin fabric, the wide frills at the neckline, the large sleeves gathered at the shoulder and cuff and the colorful sash. This was the epitome of comfort back at the day, for it was worn without any kind of hoop or pannier (this was what made it so controversial in the first place).

This is, clearly the main influence behind her designs for the Trianon retire phase.

All of these are clearly referencing that painting; from the sheer material to the back-bows and the texture of the dress itself. This was, actually a pretty wide-spread fashion around the early 1780's, a fashion that favored a certain return to basics and comfort after the extravaganza of the late 17th century and most of the 18th century.

Portrait of Marie-Joséphine de Savoie,
Comtesse de Provence
by Elisabeth Vigee-Le Brun
around the 1780's.

Another iconic portrait by Vigée Le Brun that I'm sure was used for inspiration was this one below; dated around 1785, the portrait depicts the Queen with two of her children wearing a highly decorated Robe a la Turque:

The Robe a la Turque came into fashion in the 1780's after a resurgence of interest in the Turkish world and was very fashionable during the whole 1780's decade and well into the 1790's.

In the movie, as she stands posing for a painting with her children, she is shown wearing a very similar Robe a la Turque that the one in her real portrait.

But that's not the only time she appears wearing one.

This other designs are more loosely fitted and more informal, much more influenced by this next portrait than by the one of the Queen.

Adelaide Bourbon, Duchess d'Orleans
The designer also used included other common types of gowns, such as the redingote; a woman's wear that was inspired by men's jackets and their riding coats.

This particular design is incredibly reminiscent of this silk redingote which is also dated around the 1790's:

Another type of historical dress used by Canonero is the Robe a l'Anglaise Retroussée. This style is identical to a Robe a l'Anglaise but worn with the skirts gathered up, and usually gets mixed up with the Robe a la Polonaise (to read about the difference between these two, check out this wonderful article here).

Dated between 1780 and 1785

This style is worn at several points in the movie.

This last design, the white silk gown that she wears when the Emperor of Austria (her brother) comes to visit, is very reminiscent of this painting by Louis-Roland Trinquesse dated 1774.

The music party

And then, there's the oddities. For a long time I thought that this particular black and white fur coat she wears at one point in the movie was an eccentricity of the designer and a blatant historical inaccuracy.

But years later I found this fashion plate, dating around the late 1770's, of a practically identical coat, and for once, I was very glad to be wrong (about inaccuracies, of course).

Another oddity that had me scratching my head for a while was the pink hair Marie Antoinette sports at one of her parties.

Again, I was pleasantly surprised to find out that some women actually used pink powder for their wigs during the late 18th century.

Portrait of a Young Lady, 1790

This is what any designer in a period piece should do: take from the period (both the most recognizable and the more obscure trends) and create their own thing while still being respectful to the historical heritage.

As I started off saying, I know a lot of times is a lack of budget what makes this impossible, but the most common obstacle is the misconceptions and bigotry of certain producers and/or directors, who think that accurate wardrobes will drive away and alienate audiences.

Because it actively goes against such misconceptions, Marie Antoinette is a rare movie that deserves all the praise it can get and needs to serve as a standard for commitment to historical representation.
It also should serve as  proof that you can be historically accurate and still show an artistic and thematic intention in the designs.


  1. Bahis ve casino oyunları için güncel adresimiz odeonbet. Müşteri memnuniyeti için sizleri adresine bekliyoruz.

  2. Hi, i think that i saw you visited my site so i came to “return the favor”.I'm attempting to find things to enhance my site!I suppose its ok to use some of your ideas!!emerald green prom dress


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good.
The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right.
Today, our goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

This might n…

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have a real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume.
But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous?
To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But when these change…

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe -

Opposite Lucille, stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap.

Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the movie.
The first and…

Remembering Janet Patterson

This past October, Costume Designer Janet Patterson, passed away. The four-time Oscar Nominee passing was somehow quite unexpected and very much ignored by much of the mainstream media, which is such an incredible shameful thing on their part.
As a 19th century specialist, her work is rather brief (restraining itself to movie focused on that period of time). But that makes it no less impressive as it is, as it includes such costume design masterpieces as ThePiano (Jane Campion, 1993), The Portrait of a Lady (Jane Campion, 1996), " Oscar and Lucinda (Gillian Armstrong, 1997), Bright Star (Jane Campion, 2009) and Far from the madding crowd (Thomas Vinterberg, 2015), which we actually included in our Favorite Costume Designs of 2015 list (read here).
What all of her movies share, and in great part thanks to her, is an incredible sense of realism and sensibility. And, because of it, her work has become one of the best examples that accurate historical costume does not detract from th…

Crimson Peak: Dressing Lady Lucille Sharpe. The Moth

"At home, we have only black moths. Formidable creatures, to be sure, but they lack beauty.
They thrive on the dark and the cold."
- Lucille Sharpe -

CRIMSON PEAK is Guillermo del Toro's new film. Released this past October, the movie is written by del Toro himself and Mathew Robbins (who has also collaborated with the likes of Spielberg and Lucas throughout his career). The movie aims to be a gothic romance movie through and through, and it stars Mia Wasikowska, Tom Hiddleston and Jessica Chastain.
The story goes as follows: Edith Cushing, a young budding American author, meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming but impoverished English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak.
In the movie we find two opposing…