Skip to main content

Why Oh Why? Peaky Blinders and the mystery of Grace's Crappy Hair

There are many unanswered questions out there. Many, many mysteries that will never be unraveled. But amongst those, the one that keeps me up at night is why was Grace's hair so crappy during the first season of Peaky Blinders?

Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Peaky Blinders. I'm human, believe it or not. I've watched all its five seasons (twice) and I'm impatiently waiting for its sixth season with bated breath. And I can vouch for it: it's a quality show. Good storytelling, good acting, great photography... and for the most part, great character design both in costume design and hair and makeup.

That's why I'm still baffled by the decision of having Grace's character sporting what amounts to limp California Beach Waves for the whole of the first season. 

Because, while it is true that the first season had a considerably lower budget than its following installments, a shitty approach to historical accuracy wasn't the general tone for the character's looks even back then. 

So why oh why would they do that?


For those who have lived under a rock for the past 5 years, Peaky Blinders is a British period crime drama television series created by Steven Knight. It boasts a great ensemble led by Cillian Murphy, Helen McCrory, Joe Cole and Paul Anderson with Sam Neill, Tom Hardy, Paddy Considine, Adrien Brody, Aidan Gillen, Charlotte Riley, Sam Claflin and Anya Taylor-Joy having recurring roles at various junctures of the series. 

Its first season, which is the one we are occupied with, takes place in industrial Birmingham in 1919 and follows the upward climb of Thomas Shelby, a local petty criminal, and his family as he embarks on a spectacular rise amongst the criminal world.

With that clear, let's talk hair.


The hairstyle choice for the men of the Shelby family is without a doubt one of the most iconic images of the show. It even made the hairstyle extremely popular again!

The hairstyle is a short crop with shaved sides and back. Up top, the styles vary between the hair swept forward creating a short fringe to the hair swept completely back.

Back when the show first premiered many people wondered about the hairstyle and its accuracy, precisely because it looked so jarring to modern audiences. Funny enough, it is actually very period-accurate.

This style was very common amongst working-class men from the 1910s up to the 1940s in England's industrial areas, and never really went completely out of fashion after that.

The iconic newsboy cap was essential headwear for these men back in the day, and the show did not fail to add it as well to the characters' look, rounding up this very authentic yet unique look.

All in all, it is clear they did a flawless job for these male characters: it's historically accurate, it points both at their economic background and social status and it is hella cool.

You could say that the show proved very early on that trendy and cool could come hand in hand with accuracy. A fact often disputed by producers and creators.


The hairstyling choices for the women of the Shelby family are overall quite historically accurate if a bit more "interpretative" and less literal than those of their male counterparts. Please allow me to explain.

Around 1919, right after the Great War, most women would have worn their hair long and styled in a wide array of updos not dissimilar to those fashionable before the war. While it is true that the overall fashionable hair trends of 1919 were simpler than those fashionable in the prior years as a result of the moral and social devastation caused by the war, the similarities were more present than people tend to realize. 

And yet, none of the Shelby women, during the first season, sports anything remotely similar.

For example, Polly Gray, the boys' aunt and resident badass lady of the show, has it styled pinned back at the front but loose and tightly curled at the back.

This style, while not widely used in the period, is not actually made up or completely fabricated. It is hugely influenced by the fashionable styling of the early Hollywood cinema stars, who would often sport it like this.

The following photographs of Lillian Gish and Mary Pickford, both taken at the end of the decade, are a marvelous example of the style. 

The show's stylist decided to draw inspiration for her character from a more "bohemian" style to signal her to be different from most women in 1919. She's not proper or respectable, she's a gypsy, a thief, and a gangster. So her hairstyle is more dramatic and out there. And it works well for the character.

On the other hand, Ada, the younger sister and Shelby princess, starts season 1 already sporting a bob. Which is pretty inaccurate by most accounts. 

The hairstyle known as the bob imploded into the world in 1924, and many working-class women didn't actually start sporting it until 1926, so she's basically 5 to 7 years ahead of the rest of her family.

This inaccuracy is clearly a stylistic choice meant to signal her youth to the audience as well as her tendency to look forward to the future and embrace new ideas. After all, she does become a Communist and tries to make a life of her own separately from her brother's criminal life. 

To be honest, it doesn't particularly bother me. Yes, it's inaccurate, but at least she has on a period hairstyle, merely off by a few years.

Also, it does help that her hats and other complements are consistently on point for the period.

Interpreting the period is an essential part of the process whilst designing a period piece. You need to choose amongst several trends and fashions to best highlight the character and the story. Bending the period lightly by using obscure/not common styles or even using styles slightly out of period is not always as terrible as purists might think.

But then there's Grace and her hair.


Grace Burgess, an Irish spy who finds herself after Thomas Shelby, is not as young as Ada and she is both a respectable woman and playing the part of a respectable woman (she's undercover as a poor working-class barmaid). So why the hell would she sport loose California Beach Waves that stand out like a sore thumb?

As a rich girl coming from a military family, she would be the definition of a proper woman and would therefore sport her hair in the fashion we described earlier (long hair styled in a wide array of updos). But she's a spy! I hear you say. True, but she's also pretending to be a good working girl in order to do her job. She would definitely not wear her hair in any fashion considered Boheme or unbecoming for an unmarried woman. And definitely not loose hair.

This is even more ridiculous when you consider that this very particular style of loose hair (shoulder length and wavy) would not become fashionable or acceptable until the 1970s. This is a full-on modern style slapped in the middle of a period drama.

It is absolutely jarring. Amidst all these characters in their period updos, she looks completely out of place. Why would someone make such a particularly baffling choice? Why!? Was it trying to keep me up at night? Was it trying to make me roll my eyes so hard I went blind every time the character walks into a scene? Was the bobby pin budget cut mercilessly so that they couldn't put her hair up? Why!? I need answers now!

Unfortunately, I have no real answer beyond the obvious and painful fact that as the main love interest for the protagonist some studio head thought that she needed to be really pretty and believing that modern audiences are too stupid to understand she's pretty unless she looks pretty according to modern standard, this aberration was born. Let's raise our glasses to stupidity.

My only consolation against this aberration is that when the character reappeared in late season 2 and season 3, Miss Grace showed up actually sporting a more accurate hairstyle. Once the show had proven that audiences wouldn't run at the mere sight of historical hair, even the lovely Grace was finally allowed a period hairstyle.

And yes, season 2 happens in 1922 and season 3 in 1924, so her bob is still a bit premature, just like Ada's, but with the show already having another character's sporting one, it doesn't stand out as odd. And it's better than the California Beach Waves.


Audiences are not dumb. Well... I mean... some are, but most aren't. Far from it, actually. Most people understand when a character is supposed to be pretty, even if said character doesn't look like she'd fit right in on the cover of Vogue.

The creators of the show had, clearly, every intention to try and be accurate, and it is very telling that the only character that is so completely inaccurate in the styling department is Grace. 

Thankfully, the show is good enough to survive one set of limp Beach Waves on a character and it quickly became popular enough that the creative team was given complete free reign to do whatever the hell they wanted with it.

So please, stop babying audiences. We are all adults here.


If you enjoyed this article and would like to support the blog, 
consider buying me a Coffee? 💛💛

If you want more content like this, subscribe! Or come say hi on FacebookTumblrTwitterInstagram and help us grow!

DISCLAIMER: I claim no credit for images featured on this site unless noted. Visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners, and inclusion here is under fair use for criticism, comment, and news reporting purposes. If you own the rights to content here and wish it removed, please contact me.


  1. THANK YOU for writing this. I just started watching (late of the party, clearly) but paused mid way through the S1, E3 to text my costume designer friend about how distressing these stupid beachy waves are.

    1. Absolutely, they are so distracting! I remember watching the first season with this mild irritation whenever she popped up. I'm so glad you enjoyed this blog post, It was something I needed to get out of my chest!

  2. Everytime she popped up I thought the same thing I would just get annoyed! Im glad they changed it later on !


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good. The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right. Today, my goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for me to join the yelling contest, I guess. If I'm going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise. The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there. In the tales that the G

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs' main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume. But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous? To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed the 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But wh

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe - Opposite Lucille stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap. PART II: THE BUTTERFLY Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the mo

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex B

Love her or hate her, Padme and her costumes can never be far from our minds. They are too iconic, and probably one of the few memorable aspects of the prequels, so it's really fun to talk about them. And so, I've decided to continue what I started and focus on the costumes I left behind from Episode II . So let's dive back into it! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX B: THE ATTACK OF THE CLONES Episode II: The Attack of the Clones brings the character and her designs to a completely different level; she is not a queen anymore, which unfortunately means that she no longer has amazingly weird an

Crimson Peak: Dressing Lady Lucille Sharpe. The Moth

"At home, we have only black moths. Formidable creatures, to be sure, but they lack beauty. They thrive on the dark and the cold." - Lucille Sharpe - CRIMSON PEAK is Guillermo del Toro's new film. Released this past October, the movie is written by del Toro himself and Mathew Robbins (who has also collaborated with the likes of Spielberg and Lucas throughout his career). The movie aims to be a gothic romance movie through and through, and it stars Mia Wasikowska, Tom Hiddleston and Jessica Chastain. The story goes as follows: Edith Cushing, a young budding American author, meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming but impoverished English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. In the movie

Moulin Rouge and the art of Kitsch

The spring of 2001 saw the release of Moulin Rouge! unexpectedly shake the movie industry and the box office simultaneously. Despite the many awards, including 8 nominations at the Academy Awards, and the impressive box office numbers, the movie quickly became very polarizing for audiences. Love and hate seemed to be the only two possible reactions to the movie itself. But that should not come as a surprise. The film was directed by Baz Luhrman, who has consistently been, throughout his career, one of the most polarizing filmmakers of his generation. I still have to meet anyone who simply doesn't mind his movies (which include Romeo+Juliet , Australia and The Great Gatsby ); it's either absolute love or absolute loathing. There is no middle ground with him. And that's mainly because he himself doesn't compromise when it comes to his style, which is so characteristic at this point (fast and frantic editing, vivid use of flashy colors and sparkle and stories a

Marie Antoinette: Working with an historical basis

A couple of months ago, I talked extensively about the narrative aspect of the designs for 2006's  Marie Antoinette (see here ). But that's only one half of the story. This movie is, after all, a period piece, so let's have a look at how they translated that period into the costumes. MARIE ANTOINETTE : WORKING WITH AN HISTORICAL BASIS Period accurate pieces are actually the hardest to get by; that is because clothing in past centuries was way more complex and expensive than our 21st century standards. Because of this, most costume designers end up being constricted by their allotted budgets and have to make compromises with accuracy. This was not the case with this movie. Sofia Coppola's Marie Antoinette had a rather large budget, which allowed renowned designer Milena Canonero the freedom to create period-accurate pieces (the inaccuracies were only added for narrative purposes, not budget constrictions). Because of this, Canonero decided to work off

The Costume Vault Anniversary!

Good day, beautiful readers!! First of all, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to everyone! Today is a very special day for me, here at The Costume Vault . It's our anniversary!!! We're celebrating our third anniversary! Though to be honest, I didn't actually start this project seriously until last year... So, I'm a three-year-old, with the experience of a one-year-old...? Oh, who cares. Today, three years ago, I published our first article ever. So, today is a day of celebration. This project started out of a deep love for movies and costuming and a need to share that. And also boredom... I had quite the free time back then, to be honest. But the project took off, and now I continue even when I don't have as much free time. But it's worth it because I get to share my love for movies and costuming with you. To this day, I've written sixty articles, most of which I am quite proud of indeed. And what's even better, you seem to enjoy reading

The Dressmaker. Part I: A glamorous outsider

2015's The Dressmaker is the wet dream of any costume lover in all of its 120 minutes of runtime. The Aussie film directed by Jocelyn Moorhouse is the adaptation of the Rosalie Ham's homonymous novel. After quite an impressive run in the Festival Circuit (it premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival) and garnishing numerous nominations and wins worldwide, it finally got a theatrical release, becoming a box office success and the 11th highest-grossing film of all time in its home country. So there certainly was a lot of hype around it when I finally got to see it and had a lot of expectations to live up to. ABOUT THE MOVIE So, is the movie actually that good? ... Sort of? Well, it's complicated. That's my official review tagline: it's complicated . The thing is; the movie has a ton of problems of all sorts. A lot of it doesn't work, but what does work, works really well. Let's start with the negatives. First of all, the movie is a t