Skip to main content

Marie Antoinette: Working with an historical basis

A couple of months ago, we talked extensively about the narrative aspect of the designs for the 2006's movie; Marie Antoinette (see here). But that's only one half of the story. This movie is, after all, a period piece, so let's have a look at how they translated that period into the costumes.


Period accurate pieces are actually the hardest to get by; that is because clothing in past centuries was way more complex and expensive that our 21st century standards. Because of this, most costume designers end up being constricted by their allotted budgets and have to make compromises with the accuracy. This was not the case with this movie.

Sofia Coppola's Marie Anotinette had a rather large budget, which allowed renowned designer Milena Canonero the freedom to create period-accurate pieces (the inaccuracies were only added for narrative purposes not budget constrictions). Because of this, Canonero decided to work of actual historical dresses and then alter and adjust them according to the narrative guidelines she had.

The obvious starting point, in this case, it's the actual contemporary portraits of the Marie Antoinette herself.

Portrait of a young Marie Antoinette

This portrait is one of the most famous portraits depicting the young bride, dated around the 1770's. This was must have been used, more than certainly, as inspiration for the blue dress with pink bows she wears very early on in the movie.

The neckline is practically identical, as is the color combination of blue and pink and the little choker. But it also takes inspiration from the Versailles' fashion of the time and changes the placement of the bows from the sleeves and choker (as it's in the portrait) to the stomacher, as seen in the portrait below.

Portrait de Madame Lalive de Jully,
dated around 1764

Another portrait that had to be an inspiration to the designer was this simple portrait of a very young Marie Antoinette (dated from before she married).

This peach-colored gown shows up in almost identical form in the movie itself. It's this kind of commitment to period that makes the designs for this movie so great.

Let's look now at the wedding and coronation gowns, which we barely talked about in the previous article.

Wedding design
Coronation design

In both designs, she's wearing wide panniers under the skirt, creating this elongated shape that is so very associated with the 18th century. A lot of people have wrongfully complained to me that only these two dresses use them. Because of this, allow me to recap with a short history of the panniers: Panniers or side hoops were women's undergarments worn by women in the 17th and 18th centuries to to create a skirt shape that was wide at the side while leaving the front and back relatively flat. This style originated in Spanish court fashion around the mid-17th century and was made familiar through the portraits of the Spanish Royal Family by Velázquez. Around 1718-19, the fashion started to spread through France and later to the rest of Europe. By the mid-18th century, panniers were the high fashion at Versailles, and at the most extreme, panniers got to extend the skirt several feet on each side.

But, by the 1780s, wide panniers were relegated to high-court etiquette and would have only been worn in very strict occasions, such as a wedding or a coronation, being called "court dress". And so, the fact the costume designer chose to only use panniers for these specific designs, shows how much attention to detail was put into the designs.

For proof this, look at the portrait below. Any portrait that you find of Marie Antoinette wearing wide panniers will be specifically marked as Marie Antoinette in court dress.

Marie Antoinette in a court dress
by Louise Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun (1778).

Leaving historical considerations aside, I really think this costume was the main inspiration for both dresses; especially when looking at the bodice and sleeves of the wedding dress and comparing it to the portrait above.

The day to day fashion during most of her reign (for noble women, of course) is very well captured by another of Vigée Le Brun's iconic portraits of the Queen.

This style of gown, widely known as Robe a l'Anglaise was widespread in Europe as common use dress for women, and would have been what Marie Antoinette wore on a day-to-day basis. Because of this, many of the movie's gowns are influenced by said style.

This was a very popular style throughout most of her reign, and it's easy to find many portraits of the time showing similar gowns.

Another portrait that seems to be an influence for the costumes is this other painting by Louise Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun, dated around 1783.

This depiction of the queen was, at the time, really controversial, for it showed the Queen in a very unofficial and unorthodox way. She's wearing a chemise, a new style of softer, lighter dresses popularized by Marie Antoinette in the 1780's and that would come to be known as Robe a la Reine.

The distinctive elements of this style are the white muslin fabric, the wide frills at the neckline, the large sleeves gathered at the shoulder and cuff and the colorful sash. This was the epitome of comfort back at the day, for it was worn without any kind of hoop or pannier (this was what made it so controversial in the first place).

This is, clearly the main influence behind her designs for the Trianon retire phase.

All of these are clearly referencing that painting; from the sheer material to the back-bows and the texture of the dress itself. This was, actually a pretty wide-spread fashion around the early 1780's, a fashion that favored a certain return to basics and comfort after the extravaganza of the late 17th century and most of the 18th century.

Portrait of Marie-Joséphine de Savoie,
Comtesse de Provence
by Elisabeth Vigee-Le Brun
around the 1780's.

Another iconic portrait by Vigée Le Brun that I'm sure was used for inspiration was this one below; dated around 1785, the portrait depicts the Queen with two of her children wearing a highly decorated Robe a la Turque:

The Robe a la Turque came into fashion in the 1780's after a resurgence of interest in the Turkish world and was very fashionable during the whole 1780's decade and well into the 1790's.

In the movie, as she stands posing for a painting with her children, she is shown wearing a very similar Robe a la Turque that the one in her real portrait.

But that's not the only time she appears wearing one.

This other designs are more loosely fitted and more informal, much more influenced by this next portrait than by the one of the Queen.

Adelaide Bourbon, Duchess d'Orleans
The designer also used included other common types of gowns, such as the redingote; a woman's wear that was inspired by men's jackets and their riding coats.

This particular design is incredibly reminiscent of this silk redingote which is also dated around the 1790's:

Another type of historical dress used by Canonero is the Robe a l'Anglaise Retroussée. This style is identical to a Robe a l'Anglaise but worn with the skirts gathered up, and usually gets mixed up with the Robe a la Polonaise (to read about the difference between these two, check out this wonderful article here).

Dated between 1780 and 1785

This style is worn at several points in the movie.

This last design, the white silk gown that she wears when the Emperor of Austria (her brother) comes to visit, is very reminiscent of this painting by Louis-Roland Trinquesse dated 1774.

The music party

And then, there's the oddities. For a long time I thought that this particular black and white fur coat she wears at one point in the movie was an eccentricity of the designer and a blatant historical inaccuracy.

But years later I found this fashion plate, dating around the late 1770's, of a practically identical coat, and for once, I was very glad to be wrong (about inaccuracies, of course).

Another oddity that had me scratching my head for a while was the pink hair Marie Antoinette sports at one of her parties.

Again, I was pleasantly surprised to find out that some women actually used pink powder for their wigs during the late 18th century.

Portrait of a Young Lady, 1790

This is what any designer in a period piece should do: take from the period (both the most recognizable and the more obscure trends) and create their own thing while still being respectful to the historical heritage.

As I started off saying, I know a lot of times is a lack of budget what makes this impossible, but the most common obstacle is the misconceptions and bigotry of certain producers and/or directors, who think that accurate wardrobes will drive away and alienate audiences.

Because it actively goes against such misconceptions, Marie Antoinette is a rare movie that deserves all the praise it can get and needs to serve as a standard for commitment to historical representation.
It also should serve as  proof that you can be historically accurate and still show an artistic and thematic intention in the designs.


Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good.
The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right.
Today, our goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

This might n…

The Huntsman: Winter's War. Untangling the mess. Part II

As we heavily remarked in our last article (click here to read), the Costume Design for the monstrosity that was The Huntsman: Winter's War wasn't really as good as everyone was claiming it to be. And because we are sort of unrelenting in our grudges and hates, we are going to continue hammering down this idea, this time focussing on the true stars of this movie: the two Evil Sister Queens.
So, without further ado, let's get into the madness. IV. FREYA, THE ICE QUEEN That tonal dissonance that we pointed out in the huntsmen characters becomes a cacophony the moment we consider the two Queens in this movie: Ravenna (because how could they do this movie without bringing back the only successful character in the last movie?) and her sister, Freya, who basically becomes Elsa from Frozen.
Before starting, I feel like I need to clarify that my main quarrel about both their designs has nothing to do with if they are pretty or not, which most of them are. But prettiness is not wh…

Creating the Seven Kingdoms. Part III: The Reach

In honor of the return of HBO's Game of Thrones to our screens this past summer, and as an apology for our extended hiatus, we are going to dive back into the complex visual world of Westeros once again. Previously in this series, we've focused on how the North (read here), the Westerlands (read here) and their respective cultures were represented and reinforced through the detailed Costume Design. And, today, we are going to do the same by looking at how Michele Clapton, the Costume Designer for HBO's multi-awarded show, builds the culture of the Reach and the Tyrell family.

The Reach, just like the Westerlands, it's a region that we've barely physically seen on the show until very recently. And, because of it, most of what we know about it has been inferred through their visual style and the sporadic dialogue exposition. Which, in turn, speaks very highly of the incredible work done by the Costume Design Department when it came to projecting information regardin…

Oscars Retrospective 2017: Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is the first of the planned spin-off/prequel series of the Harry Potter Saga and the screenwriting debut of J.K.Rowling, the mind behind the Harry Potter Books.
This new installment is an ambitious attempt, both in scale and in narrative, as it tries to tell both a brand new story with brand new characters and also be linked to the original saga through the character of Grindelwald.
The problem is that this juggling act forces the movie to fit in together two stories that have little to do with each other. On the one hand, there's Grindenwald and the Obscurial's story and on the other, the bizarre adventures of Newt Scamander as he tries to fetch back his creatures. Separately, these two stories, could have made for two entertaining movies, but the problem is that, together, they just don't mix  very well. On top of that, the radical changes in tone throughout the movie only manage to drag the final product further down.

But, despite…

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for us to join the yelling contest, I guess.
If we're going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise.

The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there.
In the tales that the Grimm Brothers…