Skip to main content

Mad Love: The other side of European Renaissance

The European Renaissance spans into a long period of time and has its own characteristics in every one of the different countries where it developed. This is something that is generally ignored in movies, which generally only focus on the span between 1530 and 1580 in England. Therefore, the general image of Renaissance Fashion is that of Tudor Fashion.

And so, Mad Love (2001), a Spanish production directed by Vicente Aranda is a welcome break from that monotony.

The movie tells the story of Queen Juana of Castile, more commonly known as Juana La Loca (Mad Juana) who is said to have been "loca de amor" (crazy for love). And it takes place between 1496 and 1506 (only covering her married years).

The movie takes a highly accurate route both in the sets and the costume departments, creating a mesmerizing image. What makes it so fascinating, partially, is the fact that it focuses on a time period and a place that is often overlooked. So it's very refreshing seeing a movie that focuses on an earlier Spanish Renaissance instead of focusing on Tudor England.

The costumes were done by Javier Artiñano, who also designed the costumes for The Dumbfounded King (El rey pasmado, Imanol Uribe, 1991) and The Conspiracy (La conjura del Escorial, Antonio del Real, 2008), two of the most important historical movies done in Spain in these past 20 years.



The first part of the movie covers her time in Brussels right after her marriage. In this part of the movie, the most prominent color (both in the sets and the dresses) is deep red.

The strong presence of red is there to illustrate the lust-based relation between the young couple; Juana and Felipe. The first years of marriage will be filled with raw and unadulterated passion for her. And because of this, in this first part of the movie, she is always dressed in red.

But red is also important for another character: Felipe of Habsburg. Red is a key color that helps define his character.

He is young, virile and an unashamed womanizer. For Juana, he represents this raw passion that drives her, and so; he is dressed completely in red.

But Juana is defined by more than the color she is wearing. Take a closer look at her dresses in this first part of the movie: the dress she's introduced in is a very simple one, very innocent looking.

But as we move on the narrative, her clothes progressively become more richly embroidered and more complex.

It's the only still I could find of this dress, so yes,
I'm sinning myself for repeating this photograph.

This is a very subtle way of showing her slowly evolving mentality as it progressively grows more and more complex and unstable.

In regards to the more historical aspects of this part of the movie; she is wearing different versions of a Moorish dress with heavy Italian influences.

It's true that Moorish influences on clothing were uniquely found in Spanish Fashion, but the overall shape of the dress is much more influenced by Italian Fashion than Spanish.

This is a portrait of Isabel of Castile (Juana's mother) dated around the late 1490s. This was the standard fashion for women in Spain at the time this movie begins.

This, instead, is a portrait of Isabella D'Este, an Italian Marquise dating the same period. As you can see, Juana's dress is much more similar to that, than to his mother's dress. From the high waist to the laced dress with the undershirt popping out.

This, in and on itself, is not a historical inaccuracy. Quite the contrary. At the time, Italian fashion was the reference for the rest of Europe. Because of this, a young rich woman like Juana would have tried to dress accordingly. This is even truer in her case; her father was Fernando of Aragon, and at the time, the Crown of Aragon had had control over certain areas of Italy for more than a century, so it is only logical that there would be a certain Italian influence on her clothing.

This is a portrait of a very young Juana (before she married) and she is clearly dressed in Italian fashion, thus demonstrating my theory.

Another historical detail that I really like is how they dressed Queen Isabel of Castile.

If you compare it with her portrait (above), the dress is really accurate. And the piece of detail that seals the deal for me is this:

Look at how they pinned her veil!!

They actually held her veil with pins! This seems really silly, but in movies, generally, they always stitch together all the pieces of the hairdress so that it will be easier to put on and off. But in real life, they did it this way: they pinned the veil to the head. It's a really stupid detail, but it shows how much effort and care went into this production.


During her stay in the court of Brussels, she enjoys a period of prosperity and joy as she lives side by side with a husband she adores and gets the chance to become a mother. This is shown through a change in coloration: her dresses go from deep red velvets to glorious golden fabrics.

As she becomes a mother, she also becomes more mature as a woman and starts dressing more accordingly to the Spanish fashion of the time.

The structure of this dress is very similar to the one she is wearing in this other portrait of her done during her years in Brussels.

This real historical change is used here to show that she is growing into a woman. She is no longer a young innocent girl, but a grown woman.

Another little detail that makes me really happy is how they really did a layered dress. Historically, this type of dress consisted of several layers. Mainly: an underdress and an overdress (generally in different colors). In most movies, they are sewn as one piece, while pretending to look like it's a two-piece.

But here, we clearly see how the golden dress is removed, revealing a dark green underdress. These little details make me appreciate the work of Javier Artiñano much more.


After her mother's death, Juana returns to her homeland and becomes Queen of Castile. This marks a turning point in the movie, as it coincides with her finding out that her husband is regularly cheating on her. From here on, as the movie, and her supposed madness progresses, the golden hues turn to dark blues and eventually, to blacks.

Also, she starts dressing completely according to Spanish fashion, which is only logical. She can't afford anymore to be a young fashionable girl. She's a ruler and needs to be seen by the public as one of their own.

I particularly adore this one dress as it's clearly taken from one of her portraits.

From the shape to the fabrics, everything is practically identical. But my favorite element of the design is the hood.

They went through all the trouble and actually dressed her with a really accurate hood. Many Hollywood productions would have simply put any reused English hood they had from any movie about the Tudors.

This is a 1530's English Hood and was not worn in Spain

The English hood was widely popularized by Katherine of Aragon (Juana's sister), but it was not widely used outside England. Every European country had its own version (that's why we differentiate between and English hood and a French hood). And although it isn't very widely known, this is the Spanish hood:

It's refreshing to see that they actually took the time and were so accurate in these little details.

Also, in regards to hoods, she's also shown wearing a more light and flimsy version of the hood shown above in many scenes of the film.

This is a Catalan Hood; a real historical type of headdress popular in the early 1500s in Barcelona. Again, one must remember that her father was the King of Aragon and Count of Barcelona, so it's only logical that she would be influenced by certain fashions.

Another real nice detail is the usage of high-waist dresses for pregnant women.

At the time, high fashion for women dictated a lower waistline (as seen in her first dress as Queen), but fashion for pregnant women was slightly different. The baby bump forced the waistline of the dresses upwards to avoid crushing the baby with the pressure of the corset (as shown in the picture above).

Also remarkable is the recurrent use of overdresses (a very historically accurate practice that many movies ignore).

For instance, in the picture above she is shown wearing a black overdress lined with golden thread. And throughout the scene, we can see that she is wearing another dress beneath as a separate layer.

This is the dress she is wearing beneath the black and gold overdress

And said dress also appears repeatedly without the overdress. This is definitely a nice touch because this is how a woman would have dressed at the time.

As for men's clothes, they are also very historically accurate. And this is probably my favorite men's costume in the entire movie.

To me, this costume reminds me very much of this painting, particularly the sleeves.

circa 1526

And definitely, another bonus point for the movie: Felipe gets to wear visible codpieces!


Perhaps my favorite scene in the whole movie happens right at the end and it also happens to have my favorite costume in the whole film.

As the assembly of Nobles is trying to decide whether or not to use her supposed madness to push her aside and crown her husband instead; she appears in the room completely dressed in Queenly Regalia bearing the banners of her domains to make a statement, claiming that it is time to show them that she will not be cast aside.

This is a highly historical piece of costuming. It's funny because nowadays we imagine Kings and Queens to look very fashionable and pretty. But the official Regalia for the Monarchy at the early 1500s was not that pretty, but it sure was imposing.

It consisted of a tubular overdress (usually with a dragging tale) in which were sewn all the banners of the different domains ruled over by said King or Queen, usually in golden and red. This type of dress is an heirloom from medieval times that was maintained largely during the Renaissance.

This, paired with the extremly historical headdress makes for a really nice image. And it's very nice to see that they did not need to make concessions to "current taste" in order to make the scene work.


Mad Love is a rather peculiar film and can be very polarizing for audiences, but one must give them credit for their commitment to history and accuracy.

This commitment is very admirable, especially in this day and age, where shows like "The Tudors" and "Reign" set a very clear trend on disregarding history.

Sometimes they say that it was disregarded for narrative purposes, but the truth is that it's way easier to ignore history and do whatever you want. Because creating a 100% historical wardrobe takes a lot of effort: a lot of research and a lot of money. So, to see that they made a genuine effort to create a historically accurate image in regards to the costuming and the sets of the movie is something that I appreciate very much.

My only quirk about the movie is that most of the time she is shown to wear her hair loose. I do understand that this is done to differentiate her; to show her naiveté and inner innocence. But it still bothers me sometimes.

The thing is, no one else in the movie wears it loose. All of the background characters are shown wearing real historical up-does, and this makes her stand out like a sore thumb.

But I do understand the need for that, and I know I'm just nitpicking. All in all, this movie has an impeccable costume design that makes the most out of what it's given to work with and clearly shows that you do not need to "modernize" anything to make a story work.


If you enjoyed this article and would like to support the blog, 
consider buying me a Coffee? 💛💛

If you want more content like this, subscribe! Or come say hi on FacebookTumblrTwitterInstagram and help us grow!

DISCLAIMER: I claim no credit for images featured on this site unless noted. Visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners, and inclusion here is under fair use for criticism, comment, and news reporting purposes. If you own the rights to content here and wish it removed, please contact me.


Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good. The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right. Today, my goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for me to join the yelling contest, I guess. If I'm going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise. The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there. In the tales that the G

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs' main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume. But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous? To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed the 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But wh

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe - Opposite Lucille stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap. PART II: THE BUTTERFLY Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the mo

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex B

Love her or hate her, Padme and her costumes can never be far from our minds. They are too iconic, and probably one of the few memorable aspects of the prequels, so it's really fun to talk about them. And so, I've decided to continue what I started and focus on the costumes I left behind from Episode II . So let's dive back into it! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX B: THE ATTACK OF THE CLONES Episode II: The Attack of the Clones brings the character and her designs to a completely different level; she is not a queen anymore, which unfortunately means that she no longer has amazingly weird an

Crimson Peak: Dressing Lady Lucille Sharpe. The Moth

"At home, we have only black moths. Formidable creatures, to be sure, but they lack beauty. They thrive on the dark and the cold." - Lucille Sharpe - CRIMSON PEAK is Guillermo del Toro's new film. Released this past October, the movie is written by del Toro himself and Mathew Robbins (who has also collaborated with the likes of Spielberg and Lucas throughout his career). The movie aims to be a gothic romance movie through and through, and it stars Mia Wasikowska, Tom Hiddleston and Jessica Chastain. The story goes as follows: Edith Cushing, a young budding American author, meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming but impoverished English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. In the movie

Moulin Rouge and the art of Kitsch

The spring of 2001 saw the release of Moulin Rouge! unexpectedly shake the movie industry and the box office simultaneously. Despite the many awards, including 8 nominations at the Academy Awards, and the impressive box office numbers, the movie quickly became very polarizing for audiences. Love and hate seemed to be the only two possible reactions to the movie itself. But that should not come as a surprise. The film was directed by Baz Luhrman, who has consistently been, throughout his career, one of the most polarizing filmmakers of his generation. I still have to meet anyone who simply doesn't mind his movies (which include Romeo+Juliet , Australia and The Great Gatsby ); it's either absolute love or absolute loathing. There is no middle ground with him. And that's mainly because he himself doesn't compromise when it comes to his style, which is so characteristic at this point (fast and frantic editing, vivid use of flashy colors and sparkle and stories a

Marie Antoinette: Working with an historical basis

A couple of months ago, I talked extensively about the narrative aspect of the designs for 2006's  Marie Antoinette (see here ). But that's only one half of the story. This movie is, after all, a period piece, so let's have a look at how they translated that period into the costumes. MARIE ANTOINETTE : WORKING WITH AN HISTORICAL BASIS Period accurate pieces are actually the hardest to get by; that is because clothing in past centuries was way more complex and expensive than our 21st century standards. Because of this, most costume designers end up being constricted by their allotted budgets and have to make compromises with accuracy. This was not the case with this movie. Sofia Coppola's Marie Antoinette had a rather large budget, which allowed renowned designer Milena Canonero the freedom to create period-accurate pieces (the inaccuracies were only added for narrative purposes, not budget constrictions). Because of this, Canonero decided to work off

The Costume Vault Anniversary!

Good day, beautiful readers!! First of all, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to everyone! Today is a very special day for me, here at The Costume Vault . It's our anniversary!!! We're celebrating our third anniversary! Though to be honest, I didn't actually start this project seriously until last year... So, I'm a three-year-old, with the experience of a one-year-old...? Oh, who cares. Today, three years ago, I published our first article ever. So, today is a day of celebration. This project started out of a deep love for movies and costuming and a need to share that. And also boredom... I had quite the free time back then, to be honest. But the project took off, and now I continue even when I don't have as much free time. But it's worth it because I get to share my love for movies and costuming with you. To this day, I've written sixty articles, most of which I am quite proud of indeed. And what's even better, you seem to enjoy reading

The Dressmaker. Part I: A glamorous outsider

2015's The Dressmaker is the wet dream of any costume lover in all of its 120 minutes of runtime. The Aussie film directed by Jocelyn Moorhouse is the adaptation of the Rosalie Ham's homonymous novel. After quite an impressive run in the Festival Circuit (it premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival) and garnishing numerous nominations and wins worldwide, it finally got a theatrical release, becoming a box office success and the 11th highest-grossing film of all time in its home country. So there certainly was a lot of hype around it when I finally got to see it and had a lot of expectations to live up to. ABOUT THE MOVIE So, is the movie actually that good? ... Sort of? Well, it's complicated. That's my official review tagline: it's complicated . The thing is; the movie has a ton of problems of all sorts. A lot of it doesn't work, but what does work, works really well. Let's start with the negatives. First of all, the movie is a t