Skip to main content

La Reine Margot. PART III: An Unwilling Participant

Despite all the political and religious backdrop, La Reine Margot is, after all, Margot's story. So who is Margot?


Marguerite de Valois was the daughter of Henri II of France and Catherine de' Medici and became herself Queen of Navarre and France.

Daughter of Kings and sister of Kings, she was never more than a pawn in the power plays of everyone else; being used by her mother, her brothers and later, her husband. She was always an unwilling and rebellious participant into everyone else's grand schemes and still, she tried and rebelled every way she could.

This is actually one of her most important defining traits, both in the novel and the movie. So how is that reflected in the costume design?

A FORCED MARRIAGE

Margot's wedding dress is, undoubtedly, the most iconic gown in the whole movie; and it's the perfect dress in which to introduce our main character.


This gown is designed as the perfect synthesis of the Catholic "style" as established in this movie (see PART II); a very opulent gown made of vivid red fabric and decorated to the brim. The dress itself, creates a stark contrast between husband and wife, helping to instill in the viewers a visual incompatibility between the characters.

These characters do not belong in the same world; this is not a love match. It might seem unnecessary, because we are told that it is not a love match, but it's always much better when we also can see it. And the dress does a wonderful job visualizing it.


The dress is also designed to be rigid; rather constricting. Like her life. She's being forced to marry by her mother. And so, just as her family binds her to a life she does not want, the dress binds her so tightly that she can barely move.


The symbology of the dress is what makes it so striking. Margot wedding is played as a power play to end the Wars of Religion and to establish a clearly Catholic dominance in France, and it ends being the catalyst for the Massacre of St. Bartholomew. Margot ends up being a blood offering herself, a bad omen to the land. And so, she is dressed ominously in crimson red.

DEFIANCE

Only two of her costumes are not red (or at least partially red), which is more relevant than it might seem at first glance. The first of these two "defiant" costumes makes its appearance right after the wedding, during the celebrations and, most importantly, the wedding night.


Defiance, probably, is Margot's most admirable virtue. And also her more anachronistic one. By that I don't mean that Dumas changed the historical character and made her defiant. I mean that Marguerite de Valois (both the character and the historical figure) is a woman ahead of her time because of her determination to not be molded into everyone else's expectations. Because of this, her "defiant" dresses are also the most anachronistic and "ahead of the period" in her wardrobe.


So, let's have a look at the design: the dress is made of a richly embroidered blue fabric (it's important to stress the fact that it's blue, not red), but the most peculiar element is the shape and structure itself.

It's very NOT historical and, more importantly, it's the complete opposite of the wedding dress: where that one was restricting, this one barely sticks to the body, where that one covered her whole, this one is completely revealing. The neckline is lowered radically, allowing her breathing space.

It's a very easy and effective way to show the characters liberation; from the skin showing to the free-flowing hair.


This design was the one that made me realize that, despite my general hate towards the idea, sometimes movies need to convey ideas quickly and in those cases, occasionally, inaccuracies are needed.

In a novel as massive as Queen Margot, where so much is happening, certain character traits need to be established as quickly as possible lest they get lost in the storyline. For instance, the movie needs to establish clearly that Margot is promiscuous and that she does it because her body is the only thing she really has control over. And the fastest way to make that come across is making her show skin, even if it's hugely anachronistic.


As she walks into the night, hidden by the dusk, to find a body to share a passionate moment away from her predetermined role, her actions and the dress itself become a symbol of defiance against her family and everything they stand for.

INNOCENT BLOOD ON INNOCENT HANDS

As the machinations that lead to St. Bartholomew's massacre move onwards, we see a distressed Margot wearing a deep red overdress with a white chemise.


The most interesting part of the design is the progression it has: the longer the character wears it, the more the white sleeves are turned red by the spilled blood that she, indirectly and unwillingly, has spilt.


It's a design created for movement (more than any other in the movie). The image of Margot walking down the soiled streets looking for the body of the man she tried to safe is one of the most beautiful in the whole film.


THE PAWN

To save her husband's life, Margot is forced to convince him to convert to Catholicism. And to the ceremony she wears a dark red gown with a ruffle and a thin golden laced veil.


Once again, the designer goes back to the blood symbology for the design and though it might seem as if it's repetitive, it works really well. This is a highly dramatic scene, yet so brief, that the design allows the viewer to understand certain things really fast.

Margot feels that, yet again, she has been used against her will to achieve something she doesn't really want. She feels played and disgusted for not being able to fight back.

"You invited your victims at my wedding" cries a desperate Margot as they try to shut her up. She feels like she, herself, is covered in the same blood as her brothers; as if she's been soiled under the eyes of God because she was the cause of so much blood and she let it happen.


While her brothers and their men appear at the ceremony covered in literal blood, she appears dressed in metaphorical blood (as her dress makes her look as if drenched in it). And so, the design captures beautifully her inner conflict: she is the cause of a massacre she didn't even know they were planning.


Another element of the design that makes it work so well is the shape and structure: she looks like a religious icon with the loose hair and the veil and the perfectly modest dress. But because of the tonalities of the dress, she is much closer to a twisted religious icon, like a Virgin of death.

The sum of these elements allow for a very striking and on point design.

A CAPTIVE IN HER OWN HOUSE

As the events unravel, she becomes a captive in the Louvre, a mere observer in the grand scheme of things. And so, in the first scene she appears as such, she is seen being manhandled as she lets the courtiers paint her lips in a vivid crimson red.


Again she is shown wearing a red dress, made with a fabric which is very similar to that of her wedding dress.

But the most important element of the design is not the dress itself but the makeup. Margot, throughout the majority of the movie is shown to wear no make up at all, and yet, there are two key scenes where she does: the wedding and this scene.

This is relevant because it's trying to visualize and differentiate between when she is being herself (no make up) and when she's being used (make up).


She has become, more than ever, a pawn for her family and this design (both the dress and the make up) are the perfect way to visualize it.

A FINAL ACT OF DEFIANCE

The capture and sentencing of her lover, the protestant La Mole, poses a definitive turning point for her, as she stands to lose the only thing she ever had that was truly her own; her heart. And as her desperation grows, she decides to stand up in defiance of everything she has ever known.

As she begs for La Mole's life, she presents herself in front of her brother and the whole court in a stunning white dress with no other decoration that a pearl necklace and a Lacrimosa pearl on her hair.


This, alongside the blue dress, are the only designs not to be centered around red.  And even more importantly; it is the only white dress in the movie. Nobody else gets to wear white.

Why does it matter? Because she's the only character that dares to take a public stand. Her first act of defiance (during her wedding night) was a private one, but this is a public act. She stands in front of everybody and claims: "I love this man, he has done no wrong and he can't be executed".

It's literally the first time in the whole story when anybody claims for public justice. Some characters complain about it in private, but nobody takes a stand.

It's only logical then that she is, for the first time, presented as a pure soul, the only one in this nest of vipers.


By standing up, she ends her journey as a character; slowly evolving from a proud obedient daughter to a defiant woman. From crimson red, to pristine white that gets soiled in its attempts to break free.

And here lies the greatness of Dumas' work; by making defiance a major virtue, he highlights the need to oppose those systems that foment violence and hate, even when those systems are set by those whom we hold dear.

Catherine de' Medici and her children

Somehow, both Dumas and Chéreau, manage to capture Margot spirit and make an interesting statement about it. Look at the picture; Marguerite stands in the background, almost shadowed and eclipsed by her brothers, and yet, still finding the strength to look defiantly and directly to the observer, as if challenging us, to dare judge her.

CONCLUSION

You might be wondering what all this has to do with costume design and you might be right to do so. But it's far more relevant that it may seem at first glance.

It's not until we fully understand what the creator is trying to do, that we can finally appreciate the designs done specifically for said vision. And that's what I've been trying to do throughout this three-part article.

We started this article by asking who Margot is: Margot is a defiant woman. And so, this is a movie about defiance as a virtue. So, Chéreau made a defiant movie: from the storytelling (not focusing on a regular Hollywood structure) to the visuals and the designs (staying away from the historical fashion).

Yes, they play loose with history, but it's not what the movie is about. These designs are certainly a lesson in narrative design: a demonstration of how simple and effective color coding and it's symbology really is. And how, through its good use, a color can become defiant in itself.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex A

As I'm sure I've mentioned before, the size of Padme's wardrobe is leaning towards big. One might even say gigantic. Because of this, we are forced to choose which ones we review and which ones we don't. Otherwise, we would still be reviewing the costumes from Episode I. Thanks to this selection process, right now, in our Padme series' we are reviewing costumes already from Revenge of the Sith. But lately, we've been thinking a lot about those designs that got "lost in the selection", as we call them.
WHY WEREN'T THESE SELECTED? Generally, those that we did not select for our series were considered "not interesting enough". But what does that mean? Well, it means two things; either they pulled from the exact same influences as any of the dresses we had already addressed (which would make for a very repetitive article) or were considered too simple and basic to talk about them at length.
And then, of course, were those that we simply did …

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Part II

Let’s continue with our thorough examination of the designs of Padme Amidala’s dresses. This second post in the series will be dedicated to the also terribly famous “senate” gown from “The Phantom Menace”. She wears this dress during her plea at the senate in Coruscant, and it has grown to become a terribly well known gown.

This gown has several layers to it. The base layer is a bright orange silk dress, with a high collar decorated with ornate gold stitchwork and beads. Over this, she wears a dark red overdress with orange hems decorated with gold brocade. This overdress has big sleeves and its embroider with rosettes. Above this, she wears a dark and thick faux fur cloak with shoulder pads that make her look twice her size.

Although what really made this dress iconic, is the headdress that accompanied it. Amidala's hair was dressed in a wide arc centered by a golden headpiece with golden hairbands to keep her hair's shape. This arc was decorated with dangling orichalc suspens…

Creating the Seven Kingdoms. Part I: The North

As we promised a few weeks backs, we are going to cover more tv shows from now on, mainly because there is just too much awesomeness in our TV's these days to ignore it. And for the last 5 years, the crowning jewel of TV costume design has been, without a doubt, HBO's Game of Thrones. So it was only logical to start there.
The downside is that there is so much to talk about that it becomes really difficult to decide where to start exactly. G.R.R. Martin's sprawling epic covers many characters and many places, and therefore there's really a lot to pick up from. In the end, we decided that we would take a page out of the author's tactics and split it in several different series of articles to be published gradually. And so, this is going to be the first of many. And we probably should warn you, there will be spoilers ahead. CREATING THE SEVEN KINGDOMSGame of Thrones, from an adaptation standpoint, faced many of the same problems that Peter Jackson had to face when b…

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Part I

I’ve decided to start this blog by dedicating the first posts to the designs of Padme Amidala’s dresses in the first three episodes of Star Wars. Although  I’m not particularly fond of these movies, I have to give some credit to their wardrobe design and the thought and creativity that went into it. 
We will look into the most iconic dresses of Padme Amidala and do a breakdown of the influences behind them. Each post will be dedicated to one of these dresses.
The first one of these series is the one I like to call the “Red Invasion” gown. It’s featured the first time we see Natalie Portman’s character in The Phantom Menace, and it’s probably one of the most iconic gowns she has.

This gown is made of embroidered silk and faux fur that lines the double collar, tabards, double sleeves and hem. The alien-like touch is given to the dress by the electric lights placed on the skirt, that are made to resemble ladybugs.
The head piece that accompanies this dress is also pretty iconic in and on it…

A look into Star Wars: Padme's dresses. Part X

The last design from Episode II which we are going to be covering is the wedding gown, which happens to be the literal last outfit worn by the character in the movie.

She wears this dress in the final scene of Episode II, during her wedding with Anakin. It's a brief scene, but somehow people really remember this gown.
The design consists of an intricate gown made of lace and beads that goes with a lace veil. The gown is long and flowing, and has a small tail. The white fabric is decorated with an off-white delicate embroidery. The sleeves reach her elbows and are hemmed with scalloped lace. The entire gown is studded with pearls.

This gown takes from various historical sources, most of them pertaining to the early 20th century. The basic one with which it work are Edwardian fashion (1901-1911) and the 1920's.
The basic structure, with the gown and the laced overdress, is clearly taken from late Edwardian fashion.

These dresses (dated 1912) are quite similar to Padme's gow…