Skip to main content

Period Movies to Survive a Quarantine. Part IV

This week I'll briefly expand on more of the recommendations I've been posting on social media so you'll be able to make a more informed decision when choosing your choice entertainment for the afternoon. This time I'll cover the recommendations I made from April 20th to April 29th.


Recommendation for APRIL 20th


2016′s Spy-thriller ALLIED is a rather mediocre movie. It’s entertaining but hardly original. Still, there are two saving graces in this movie: the first one is the always splendid performance of Marion Cotillard, who continues to prove that she is one of the best actresses of her generation, and the second one is the stunning costume design.

And by stunning, I mean STUNNING. 

The main idea behind the design was to recreate the look and feel of the Golden Age of Hollywood. To bring back to life the world of glamour that Dietrich and Bergman inhabited in the 30s and 40s. And it needed to feel natural to the story and the characters whilst also managing to visually represent each character’s personality and each character’s arc. Certainly not an easy act to balance, but Johnston certainly made the most out of it.

If you are interested, here’s an article we did about the designs: Oscars Retrospective 2017: Allied.

Recommendation for APRIL 21st


Florence Pugh, back then practically unknown to moviegoers, hand in hand with director William Oldroyd delivered a powerful adaptation of Nikolai Leskov’s novel Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk: a bold and uncompromising movie that brought forth a riveting, magnetic and incredibly tense tale about power, oppression and the creation of monsters.

Whilst the subtle directing choices, the nuanced acting, and the sublime photography are real standouts for this movie, the beauty, and subtlety of the costumes created by Holly Waddington haunt us to this day. 

Here, the Costume Design manages to find the delicate balance between respecting period-appropriate costuming and character-based design.

Recommendation for APRIL 22nd


Ridley Scott’s GLADIATOR was a game-changer in so many ways. It brought back the historical epic in a big way and it, unfortunately, caused a string of cheap knock offs that would plague the first decade of the new century.

Still, it was worth it. A memorable movie if ever was one, I still watch it every chance I get. The scale, the score, the script, and the themes… it just works so well.

As for the costume design, the level of detail poured into the design brings this world to life. Usually, “roman” tends to translate in overly simple white tunics, but Yates did a lot of research and completely avoided this common fault. And it pays off big time.

Recommendation for APRIL 23rd


It's April 23rd, World Book Day, and Shakespeare’s Day, and in honor of that, I recommend Kenneth Branagh spectacular epic adaptation of the Bard’s HAMLET. 

This is the only adaptation of the full text of the play and it spared no extravagance. A star-studded cast is able to infuse gravitas and passion in every line of this four hour mammoth of an adaptation.

The film also moves the story forward in time, to be set in the 19th century, and the change makes for spectacular visuals.

As for the costume design, it makes the most out of the romantic aesthetic. It is grand, over the top and highly dramatic.

Recommendation for APRIL 24th


Before any of you rants about it: I’m well aware of exactly how historically inaccurate this film is. I know, and I hate it, but I also love ti. I just can’t help it.

The only aspect of the film that hasn’t aged quite as well for me is the tints of homophobia it has through the portrayal of Edward the Second. Yes, it is historically known that he was homosexual, or had, at least, relationships with men. It is also historically known that he was a terrible king. Still, the movie didn’t need to turn him into a buffoon. Please, fast forward his scenes.

As for costume design, I’m also aware that the kilt as portrayed in the film emerged in the 18th century. I’m aware that the Scotts would have been dressed for battle in a fairly similar way as the English. But I am also aware that this film is one of the few with the balls to have a female character who is supposed to be a love interest wear a full wimple. And I really like it.

Recommendation for APRIL 25th


I’ve always been in love with this film. The sheer love and fascination it transpires are just so fascinating.

The movie is a simple story, magnificently told. It has the epic sweep and clarity of a classic Western, but it abandons the contrivances of ordinary plotting to look at the way strangers get to know one another. 

Simple, yes, but not an easy feat to pull off, as later AVATAR and THE LAST SAMURAI would prove.

As for the costume design, it’s, just as the rest of the film, gorgeously simple.

Recommendation for APRIL 26th


I’m literally the worst. This is, once again, not a movie. Marvel’s “Agent Carter” is probably the only Marvel TV show I actually like (please, don’t shot me, where would I be if I was not giving you reasons to hate me).

It’s quirky, cheesy and just the perfect dose of fun for a Sunday afternoon.

Also, Hayley Atwell is simply the Best.

And the costume design is simply superb. The design for the show, right off the bat, poses a couple of major problems: it needs to resemble the look of the American 40s while adapting to the needs of the story (the inclusion of aliens, superheroes and all the sci-fi elements) and it needs to find a way to dress a woman in believable 40’s clothing and still seem believable that she would be able to kick, run and perform all sorts of stunts. But it succeeded in managing to overcome those problems and create a very iconic and memorable wardrobe for the show: it’s era-appropriate, it’s clever and it speaks to the character and the world she inhabits.

We like it so much that we actually needed three full articles to cover it all: Agent Carter: 1940’s superhero espionage. Part I, Part II, Part III.

Recommendation for APRIL 27th


I know most people shy away from this movie. It has a bad reputation. But I think it’s quite an undeserved one. True, Orlando Bloom is not the best actor around (even if it pains my teen self to accept) and the movie would have definitely benefited from casting a better actor. It would also have benefited from leaving less plot behind on the cutting room floor. Comparing the theatrical cut with the director’s cut it’s easy to see that the producers cut the story to its bare bones so it wouldn’t reach the 2 hours 30-minute mark but also kept all the action sequences. This comes at the cost of plot logic and character nuance, and it hurts the final product.

So, my personal recommendation: watch the Director’s Cut. The plot makes sense and Eva Green gets a full subplot for herself. It’s amazing and really entertaining.

As for the costume design, it’s pretty much on point both historical and character-based.

Recommendation for APRIL 28th


2003′s GIRL WITH A PEARL EARRING is a quiet movie, its ripples of emotional turbulence far beneath the surface. It is about things not said and opportunities not taken.

There are many ways the film could have gone wrong. The novel it’s based on has all the elements to turn this adaptation into a romantic melodrama. The movie, instead, tells the story simply and subtly. Vermeer paintings are contemplative, reflective, subdued, and so is the film.

The costume design follows a similar approach. It takes a lot of inspiration (in color and texture) from Flemish painting, and it is constructed to help the set design and the photography in recreating Vermeer’s aesthetic.

Recommendation for APRIL 29th


Martin Scorsese’s GANGS OF NEW YORK is a violent, blood-soaked story that aims to tear down America’s foundational myths. Scorsese postulates that America wasn’t built on dreams: it was built on blood, violence, prejudice, and an unjust system.

Maybe that’s why it got such a tepid response back then. Unfortunately, because it’s a great film by a great director with great performances. So go watch it!

As for the costume design, let’s remind ourselves that Sandy Powell is a legend for a reason.

NEXT WEEK WE'LL BRING YOU MORE!

Let me know your thoughts!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoyed this article and would like to support the blog, 
consider buying me a Coffee? 💛💛

If you want more content like this, subscribe! Or come say hi on FacebookTumblrTwitterInstagram and help us grow!

DISCLAIMER: I claim no credit for images featured on this site unless noted. Visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners, and inclusion here is under fair use for criticism, comment, and news reporting purposes. If you own the rights to content here and wish it removed, please contact me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good. The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right. Today, my goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for me to join the yelling contest, I guess. If I'm going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise. The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there. In the tales that the G

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs' main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume. But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous? To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed the 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But wh

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe - Opposite Lucille stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap. PART II: THE BUTTERFLY Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the mo

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex B

Love her or hate her, Padme and her costumes can never be far from our minds. They are too iconic, and probably one of the few memorable aspects of the prequels, so it's really fun to talk about them. And so, I've decided to continue what I started and focus on the costumes I left behind from Episode II . So let's dive back into it! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX B: THE ATTACK OF THE CLONES Episode II: The Attack of the Clones brings the character and her designs to a completely different level; she is not a queen anymore, which unfortunately means that she no longer has amazingly weird an

Crimson Peak: Dressing Lady Lucille Sharpe. The Moth

"At home, we have only black moths. Formidable creatures, to be sure, but they lack beauty. They thrive on the dark and the cold." - Lucille Sharpe - CRIMSON PEAK is Guillermo del Toro's new film. Released this past October, the movie is written by del Toro himself and Mathew Robbins (who has also collaborated with the likes of Spielberg and Lucas throughout his career). The movie aims to be a gothic romance movie through and through, and it stars Mia Wasikowska, Tom Hiddleston and Jessica Chastain. The story goes as follows: Edith Cushing, a young budding American author, meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming but impoverished English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. In the movie

Moulin Rouge and the art of Kitsch

The spring of 2001 saw the release of Moulin Rouge! unexpectedly shake the movie industry and the box office simultaneously. Despite the many awards, including 8 nominations at the Academy Awards, and the impressive box office numbers, the movie quickly became very polarizing for audiences. Love and hate seemed to be the only two possible reactions to the movie itself. But that should not come as a surprise. The film was directed by Baz Luhrman, who has consistently been, throughout his career, one of the most polarizing filmmakers of his generation. I still have to meet anyone who simply doesn't mind his movies (which include Romeo+Juliet , Australia and The Great Gatsby ); it's either absolute love or absolute loathing. There is no middle ground with him. And that's mainly because he himself doesn't compromise when it comes to his style, which is so characteristic at this point (fast and frantic editing, vivid use of flashy colors and sparkle and stories a

Marie Antoinette: Working with an historical basis

A couple of months ago, I talked extensively about the narrative aspect of the designs for 2006's  Marie Antoinette (see here ). But that's only one half of the story. This movie is, after all, a period piece, so let's have a look at how they translated that period into the costumes. MARIE ANTOINETTE : WORKING WITH AN HISTORICAL BASIS Period accurate pieces are actually the hardest to get by; that is because clothing in past centuries was way more complex and expensive than our 21st century standards. Because of this, most costume designers end up being constricted by their allotted budgets and have to make compromises with accuracy. This was not the case with this movie. Sofia Coppola's Marie Antoinette had a rather large budget, which allowed renowned designer Milena Canonero the freedom to create period-accurate pieces (the inaccuracies were only added for narrative purposes, not budget constrictions). Because of this, Canonero decided to work off

The Costume Vault Anniversary!

Good day, beautiful readers!! First of all, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to everyone! Today is a very special day for me, here at The Costume Vault . It's our anniversary!!! We're celebrating our third anniversary! Though to be honest, I didn't actually start this project seriously until last year... So, I'm a three-year-old, with the experience of a one-year-old...? Oh, who cares. Today, three years ago, I published our first article ever. So, today is a day of celebration. This project started out of a deep love for movies and costuming and a need to share that. And also boredom... I had quite the free time back then, to be honest. But the project took off, and now I continue even when I don't have as much free time. But it's worth it because I get to share my love for movies and costuming with you. To this day, I've written sixty articles, most of which I am quite proud of indeed. And what's even better, you seem to enjoy reading

The Dressmaker. Part I: A glamorous outsider

2015's The Dressmaker is the wet dream of any costume lover in all of its 120 minutes of runtime. The Aussie film directed by Jocelyn Moorhouse is the adaptation of the Rosalie Ham's homonymous novel. After quite an impressive run in the Festival Circuit (it premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival) and garnishing numerous nominations and wins worldwide, it finally got a theatrical release, becoming a box office success and the 11th highest-grossing film of all time in its home country. So there certainly was a lot of hype around it when I finally got to see it and had a lot of expectations to live up to. ABOUT THE MOVIE So, is the movie actually that good? ... Sort of? Well, it's complicated. That's my official review tagline: it's complicated . The thing is; the movie has a ton of problems of all sorts. A lot of it doesn't work, but what does work, works really well. Let's start with the negatives. First of all, the movie is a t