Skip to main content

Some Honest thoughts: Padmé Amidala's Costumes

As I suppose you are all aware, I've written extensively about the costumes for Padmé Amidala in the Star Wars Prequels in this blog. It seems only logical, this is, after all, a blog dedicated to Costume Design, and hers is pretty iconic and vast.

You can find all my articles dedicated to her here.

Unfortunately, it seems my thoughts and opinions on the matter have not been welcomed by some, as I've gotten a lot of messages violently asking me why I hate Padmé Amidala's costume design, and even, sometimes, going as far as to accuse me of hating the character itself. This has left me a bit worried, and I thought it was time for sharing some honest thoughts on the matter.


EPISODE I: I'M NOT PARTICULARLY FOND OF THESE MOVIES

I've certainly claimed this a lot. And it's true. It is a true statement not only for me but for a lot of people as well if the internet is to be believed.

Still, somehow, some people have taken this claim to mean that as I do not like the movies, I must hate the costumes. Funny because as much as I've claimed to dislike the films, I've also heaped praise towards the creative effort made by the costume department and the creative talent poured behind Amidala's designs. More often than not I've also underlined just how iconic her wardrobe is. I have the receipts to prove it.


So what I gather from this, is that the fact that I do not enjoy the movies themselves means I am not able to honestly appreciate if there's something good in them?

I like to think it is possible to separate these two things.

Also, would I have bothered writing up to 14 full articles about her costumes if I didn't think there was any merit in them? Of course not! I've been forced to dedicate an article to things I don't like and it's painfully to work on them. I simply would not undergo that pain 14 times if I hated her costumes.


EPISODE II: WHY ARE YOU ALWAYS COMPLAINING?

So, long story short, the fact that I do not enjoy the Star Wars Prequels does not mean that I hate the Costume Design for the movies, particularly the spectacularly beautiful Costume Design for Padmé Amidala. That's a fact.

So, why are you always complaining?????

Well, children, liking something doesn't mean that you shouldn't apply some critical thinking to it. It's a good habit to have.

But, as I have often stated, good costume design is more than just a collection of good looking dresses. Great costume design has to be more than a fashion line collection. It has to function as a piece of the narrative. And there's where Amidala's costume design tends to not pull through.

I am particularly critical of certain designs for Amidala, where the narrative circumstances in which the character was supposed to wear them hadn't really been taken into account for the design. Like, dressing her in heavy velvet for a battle, dressing her in wool for her first visit to Tatooine (a planet dessert), or dressing her in the sexiest and most sexual costume in the whole trilogy for a scene in which she is trying to convince Anakin to stop pursuing her romantically. 


I know that a fantasy film doesn't have to be realistic, that it has certain leeway with reality. But it has to be consistent and it has to be believable. The audience needs to believe it's real within the world it takes place and therefore it needs to follow a certain logic.

Heavy, bothersome clothing for a battle or thick, warm clothing for a desert goes against any logic.

I don't think that pointing these inconsistencies out makes me a "hater". You can absolutely disagree with me. You can think it makes absolute sense. And that would be quite alright. Just don't mistake criticism with hate.

Being critical doesn't mean I don't like the designs or that I think there wasn't a real effort put on them, it just means that I think they lack a clear direction, which should have been provided by THE DIRECTOR. And we all know that Lucas was more interested in created nice visuals than telling a cohesive story.

EPISODE III: FOR THE SAKE OF EYE CANDY

That lack of direction translates into a general feeling of lack of cohesion between the different costumes. It feels like when the costume designer presented different options and approaches to the costumes to Lucas, he gave a long look at them and proclaimed: " I want all of them".

And that's how we ended up with costumes with heavy Asian influences, costumes with heavy European influences,... fire motifs here, water motifs there... all for the same character.


For me, this creates a rather blurry sense of Naboo's culture, Padmé's cultural background, and Padmé's personality, all of which take a backseat to the proliferation of Eye Candy. Looking at the whole of the Costume design for her character, it feels like it was more important to look pretty than to make sense. It certainly reads as if the only character note the director gave the costume department was that Padmé was a Queen and that she was beautiful (and sometimes hot).

And the pieces they crafted certainly do look regal, and beautiful. But hardly anything else.

Sure, this makes real fun looking at promotional pictures of her character, but a true nightmare when trying to make sense of the whole as a storytelling device.

EPISODE IV: THOSE THAT I SIMPLY DID NOT LIKE

But you said that you "totally and deeply loathe it"...

That splendid quote was said by me in regards to one specific costume: the Smouldering Corset Gown (as I've come to call it) from Attack of the Clones and I absolutely stand by it.


It is so clearly designed with the sole directive of making her look sexy and to do so it strays so far away from the already incohesive design ideas that have been established that it feels totally out of place in the Star Wars Universe. That's why I can't stand to look at it.

But that statement was, under no circumstance, directed at the whole costume design for the character or the trilogy.

Truth be told, I don't like some of the designs of the trilogy for Padmé. I like most of them, but there are the select few which I, unfortunately, don't. She has so many, that it shouldn't surprise anyone.

But I don't think that is reason to scream at me through the internet that then "You don't really like Padmé and her stunning costumes".

The fact that I like a Film's Costume Design as a whole doesn't mean I can't dislike some individual design or apply critical thinking to it.

EPISODE V: THEY DESERVED BETTER

I am not sure how to underline this, but critical thinking doesn't equal hate. I absolutely do not hate the character of Padmé nor her Costume Design even if I am vocal and passionate about the things I think don't work about them.

She's a good character and she had a lot of potential for being iconic, but bad storytelling and bad writing have encased her in a not very good, rather bad, film trilogy. That's the most honest opinion about Padmé that I'll be able to give you.

True that she is an intelligent, politically active, decisive woman in film, but it is also true that the movie gives her almost nothing to do past the first film and is quickly relegated to love interest. She certainly deserved a better movie to be in.

Her costume design finds itself in a similar position. As it is, it's pretty but falls short on a narrative level. Seeing the eye for detail, level of creativity, and incredible craftmanship at the movie's disposal in regards to costume, it's a shame that a bad script cut short the opportunities of the designs to rise to their full potential.

And those are my honest thoughts.

WRAPPING UP

And most importantly, if you disagree with me in any of my articles, you are more than welcome to let me know! I enjoy discussing different points of view and sometimes, I find myself to be actually in the wrong. So please, let me know what you think whether you agree with me or not! Just don't yell at me for it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoyed this article and would like to support the blog, 
consider buying me a Coffee? 💛💛

If you want more content like this, subscribe! Or come say hi on FacebookTumblrTwitterInstagram and help us grow!

DISCLAIMER: I claim no credit for images featured on this site unless noted. Visual content is copyrighted to its respective owners, and inclusion here is under fair use for criticism, comment, and news reporting purposes. If you own the rights to content here and wish it removed, please contact me.

Comments

  1. Here's the thing: whether you meant to do this or not, I think every single one of your Padme articles ends on a negative note. Literally every one. It didn't matter whether you liked the outfit or not. If it wasn't a jab at the movies or George Lucas (which... go for it, many people have made an Olympic sport of the same), you were criticizing the costuming team for jarring you out of the movie or using too many varietal influences (or not using them appropriately) or not using those influences correctly. You use the word 'loathe' a lot. It's your blog and your opinions - more power to you. But that final conclusive statement is what the reader leaves with, and I did not find myself contemplating the fascinating historical influences that you had beautifully researched, as I should have, but mulling over these negative final statements.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi! I'm aware that I tend to be very vocally negative about things, and your assessment is pretty accurate and fair. I'm sorry if the negativity puts anyone off. At the end of the day, I think the designs are beautiful but do a rather poor narrative job, which to me, means they fail as narrative devices, which is the main purpose of a costume design. I don't think it's the designer's fault as much as the fault of an unfocused director.
      And I understand people who don't agree with me. Sometimes you just want to look at pretty dresses. That's also understandable.
      The thing is, I wrote this article both to sort of wrap up this series of articles that had been going on for so long and to address the fact that I had a lot of people leaving me rather nasty private messages on Tumblr mainly regarding my opinions on Padme's costumes. Those messages weren't telling me they disagreed with my views or that they didn't understand where I was coming from. Those were really vitriolic and violent, and I really don't appreciate them.
      I honestly like people coming to the blog (be it here or any of my social media) to let me know what they think or how they feel about my articles and I appreciate thoughtful comments that give inside on how an article reads, such as you did yourself.
      But I don't like hate comments, like at all, and those were the kind of comments I had been getting for a long time.
      Thanks for reading and thank you for taking the time to comment. Lots of love!

      Delete
  2. I agree with all what you said here. Being honest i dislike her character , snd no comments with the bad script desicions, most of the time makes no sense, and as you said, at the end she was just the love interest.
    We can appreciate the work in design, but the prequels are badly written and thats a fact.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you, well said!! They showcased all her “looks” in the previews and made such a fuss about them, but they always struck me as shizophrenic and so out of place. You have finally articulated exactly what was wrong. I thought the Geisha look was the most hilarious, since it was so out of place and appeared to relegate her to the role of a Courtesan, which was possibly intentional since that was basically her role in the prequels. There has been no lack praise about her costumes, so while some may view your words as harsh or overly negative, I think it is rightfully so and a much needed counterpoint to the endless gushing and praise about this incoherent design school notebook that is Padme.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good. The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right. Today, my goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex B

Love her or hate her, Padme and her costumes can never be far from our minds. They are too iconic, and probably one of the few memorable aspects of the prequels, so it's really fun to talk about them. And so, I've decided to continue what I started and focus on the costumes I left behind from Episode II . So let's dive back into it! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX B: THE ATTACK OF THE CLONES Episode II: The Attack of the Clones brings the character and her designs to a completely different level; she is not a queen anymore, which unfortunately means that she no longer has amazingly weird an

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for me to join the yelling contest, I guess. If I'm going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise. The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there. In the tales that the G

Historic Accuracy in Costume Design: The 16th century

I've never been a purist with historical accuracy as long as the changes made have real reasoning behind (generally a narrative or symbolic one). I will always think that La reine Margot (1994) costume design is one of the most gorgeous and smart designs ever, even if said designs' main premise is to purposely bend the period in regards to costume. But there are certain things that bother me in regards to historical accuracy in costume which I realized when I found myself constantly irritated while watching The other Boleyn Girl (2008). This led me to post a question: when is it right to bend history? why is it interesting sometimes? whilst other times it's simply horrendous? To me, when these changes are made for the narrative's sake, I'm usually on board (like the 2012's "Anna Karenina" designs, which mixed the 1870's fashion with 1950's fashion in order to enhance the sense of theatricality and falsehood in Imperial Russia). But wh

Why Oh Why? Peaky Blinders and the mystery of Grace's Crappy Hair

There are many unanswered questions out there. Many, many mysteries that will never be unraveled. But amongst those, the one that keeps me up at night is why was Grace's hair so crappy during the first season of Peaky Blinders ? Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Peaky Blinders . I'm human, believe it or not. I've watched all its five seasons (twice) and I'm impatiently waiting for its sixth season with bated breath. And I can vouch for it: it's a quality show. Good storytelling, good acting, great photography... and for the most part, great character design both in costume design and hair and makeup. That's why I'm still baffled by the decision of having Grace's character sporting what amounts to limp California Beach Waves for the whole of the first season.  Because, while it is true that the first season had a considerably lower budget than its following installments, a shitty approach to historical accuracy wasn't the general tone for the

Cleopatra or the Most Undeserved Oscar Win ever

There is a reason why I usually do not review movies from the "golden age" of Hollywood (which means any movie prior to the 1970s), and that is because back then they cared even less about historical accuracy in costuming than nowadays, which is saying a lot. Because of this, most of the "historical" movies generally ignored the period and just did whatever was fashionable at the time with a spice of the supposed period. This is something that usually makes me laugh, rather than angry, because it results in very funny outfits (peplums particularly created a lot of funny imaginary). And Cleopatra , 1963's epic about the Egyptian queen, was for most of my childhood one of those movies. I knew the costumes were not accurate, but they fascinated me anyways in their ridiculousness. That is until I heard that the movie had won an Academy Award for Best Achievement in Costume Design, the same year that " Il Gattopardo  was nominated for Best Costume Design. A

Crimson Peak: Dressing Edith Cushing. The Butterfly

"Beautiful things are fragile" - Lucille Sharpe - Opposite Lucille stands our main character in the movie: Edith Cushing, a young and naive American with ambitions to become a writer. She meets and falls in love with a handsome and charming, but impoverished, English baronet: Sir Thomas Sharpe. They eventually marry and return to England, to the Sharpe's dilapidated mansion: Allerdale Hall. There they live with Thomas's sister: Lucille. The deadly apparitions that haunt the house will force Edith to slowly uncover the buried secrets of Crimson Peak. And so, Edith is to become a fragile butterfly caught in a moth's trap. PART II: THE BUTTERFLY Edith has considerably more frocks and gowns than Lucille does. It's only logical. Edith is our protagonist and, as such, has a bigger emotional arc throughout the movie, and she undergoes bigger changes. These are, in part, expressed through the costumes she wears and how these change throughout the mo

The FollowUP: Disney's Jasmine and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Previously in this blog, I talked about how the aesthetics of the Disney Princess Brand have changed through the different iterations of Cinderella (read here ). Since then, Disney hasn't stopped rehashing and remaking its old animated classics. On the contrary, it has doubled down on this business model and its remakes have become more common, more widespread, and more successful. Since the 2015 remake of Cinderella , Disney has remade The Jungle Book (April 2016), Beauty and the Beast (March 2017), Dumbo (March 2019), Aladdin (May 2019), The Lion King (July 2019), Lady and the Tramp (November 2019), Mulan (scheduled for release July 2020) and Cruella (scheduled for release May 2021). Remakes for Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs , Pinocchio , The Little Mermaid , The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and Bambi are in development. Clearly, the live-action remake has become a staple of the brand and it cannot be ignored. Unfortunately. Seeing that this industry trend will not go any

Moulin Rouge and the art of Kitsch

The spring of 2001 saw the release of Moulin Rouge! unexpectedly shake the movie industry and the box office simultaneously. Despite the many awards, including 8 nominations at the Academy Awards, and the impressive box office numbers, the movie quickly became very polarizing for audiences. Love and hate seemed to be the only two possible reactions to the movie itself. But that should not come as a surprise. The film was directed by Baz Luhrman, who has consistently been, throughout his career, one of the most polarizing filmmakers of his generation. I still have to meet anyone who simply doesn't mind his movies (which include Romeo+Juliet , Australia and The Great Gatsby ); it's either absolute love or absolute loathing. There is no middle ground with him. And that's mainly because he himself doesn't compromise when it comes to his style, which is so characteristic at this point (fast and frantic editing, vivid use of flashy colors and sparkle and stories a

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Annex C

It's been a while, but I always come back to her in the end. Padmé Amidala, from the Star Wars Prequels, is a Style Icon and my personal standout from the mess that Episode I to III ended up being. Because of it, I've decided it was time to finish what I started so long ago and finally address Episode III . It took me long enough.  So let's dive back into it for one last chance to love, hate, snark and bark at the astonishing monstrosity that is Padmé's Wardrobe! A BRIEF REMINDER What are the Annexes? Well, the Annexes focus on all the costumes that were "left behind" in my selection of Padme Costumes for the A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses series. Here, I point out influences, likes, and dislikes, and anything that might feel relevant whilst digging into the gigantic wardrobe of this Galactic Queen. With this out of the way, let's go! ANNEX C: REVENGE OF THE SITH Episode III: Revenge of the Sith brings the prequel trilogy to a close and, ve