Skip to main content

A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Part IV

After having looked at the three most iconic designs of the first of the "Star Wars" prequels, I've decided to move onwards and start looking into the designs of Amidala’s wardrobe in the second installment of the prequels: “Star Wars: Attack of the Clones”.

The first of the designs that we will be breaking apart will be the “Travel” gown. 

She wears this dress during her journey back to Naboo, disguised as a young matron from the Thousand Moons system. It’s not one of the most remembered gowns, but it’s a very striking piece of design with very interesting influences.

The dress consists of a mustard-colored overdress which is a stiff upside-down cone that reaches from her shoulders to her ankles. It is decorated with purple paisley designs with olive green leaves, and a feathery purple design running down the front, back, and sides. The bottom hem is decorated with a simple diamond design. On her shoulders, she wears a kind of full-shouldered pauldron of the same mustard color with an abstract floral design. The loose sleeves are of a lighter material, and are drawn at the wrist by a lower-arm band of the same design as the pauldrons. 

The main influence behind the design is pretty clear: it’s based on the Russian traditional gown. This poses a really big change in relation to the look and feel of the design, straying notably from the east-Asian influences of "The Phantom Menace" designs. And although they maintain some of the visuals of the first movie, this change of inspiration marks a pretty radical change in the look of the character.

This change in the look gives a sense of discontinuity between the two movies that is not always good for the overall story. But in the case of this specific design, this change is actually logical. In the movie, she is supposed to be dressed as a young woman from another system, so it is only logical that her look would be so different from the established Naboo look.

The main purpose of the dress is to disguise the former queen. Because of this, the dim color palette is more than fitting. The mustard colored dress matched with the golden veil and the brown-green sleeves help to maintain the desired low-key appearance. It’s not a gown that stands out in a crowd. It’s discreet and simple, but, because of the cut of the dress, conveys Amidala’s innate elegance and regal airs.

Because of this, the fabric used is very important in the design. It mixes two different types to create the effect of a simple but regal gown: on one hand there is the fabric used in the overdress, the pauldron and the lower-arm band, which is a very heavy looking and rigid fabric in line with the image we have of regal gowns. On the other hand, there are the sleeves, the fabric that loops under her neck and the lace, which are very light and flowing, giving the design a more day to day feel to the dress.

As I've mentioned, the historical influence on the design is very clear. Both the shape and weight of the dress take its main inspiration from the traditional gown for noble women of 16th-17th century Russia.

Both dresses date from
the mid 16th to 17th
century Russia

Both gowns share the same rigid and tube-like overdress that successfully disguises the feminine shape as well as the loose sleeves with the lower-arm band.

The main difference resides in the fact that the Russian overdress is, generally, more decorated and luxurious (they usually sew pearls and stones into elaborate brocades) whilst Amidala's is fairly simple. This simplicity is actually due to a narrative necessity more than a whim of the design. The need for the gown to be a disguise is the reason why they change the heavy brocade for the more delicate and discreet floral pattern.

For this very same reason, the design also swaps the highly decorated collar for a more simple full-shoulder pauldron.

The Grand Duchess Xenia
Alexandrovna dressed as
a 17th century royal woman for
a ball at the Winter Palace.

Another remarkable aspect of the dress is the color itself. Through episode II and III most of Amidala’s wardrobe is dark blue, purple, dark red and black, with the exceptional white. All these are colors usually identified with royalty. This design strays from this and goes with a green-yellow palette. This is done to underline the fact that this is not an “official” gown. She wears this dress because she doesn’t want to be recognized. It’s also because of this that the gown takes the “shapelessness” from the traditional Russian gown. Most of her dresses are pretty revealing, stressing the feminine shape of the character. By hiding that shape under the conic overdress she becomes almost a different person.

This change in color, though, is not unique to this design. It's actually done a couple of times throughout both "The attack of the clones" and "Revenge of the Sith", and it's always associated with a less "official" situation.

Last but not least, let's have a look at the headdress.

The headpiece is made of a coppery metal with a tight skull cap with ridges running up into an intricate, fan-like crown. The Flower of Life emblem decorates the crest of the headpiece in a continuous pattern. Under this piece, there’s a length of mustard-colored fabric that loops under her face and wraps around her neck. This headdress is sometimes covered by a golden lace veil.

And so, this design not only hides her very distinctive body shape, it also completely covers her hair. This is another big change, because throughout the movies she always wears her hear visible and in hairstyles that tend to call attention to it.

The headdress without the laced veil

The influence behind the headdress doesn't stray too much from the main influence for the gown: it is clearly influenced by the Russian kokoshnik.

The kokoshnik is a traditional Russian headdress that has been used since the 16th century.

17th century kokoshnik

As seen in this picture, the kokoshnik shares a similar constitution: a flowing fabric that looks around and under her face and a highly ornamented headpiece. This particular piece has no veil over it, but some of the later versions of this type of headdress do (as the versions shown in these 19th century paintings).

The shape of the main headpiece is clearly also inspired by the shapes of this Russian headdress. The only difference is the material itself. For Amidala's design, they chose a metal feel to it. This accentuates the outlandish feel it wants to create.

This piece wraps up the look of this amazing design. The only problem with it is that, if anything, it doesn't look alien enough. It's a very elegant and very beautiful design, but it's too grounded in reality to feel otherworldly. Its influences are too specific and focussed in Russian tradition. Unlike the dresses in "The phantom menace", that mixed a number of different influences, this one focusses only on one and ends up looking like a modern version of the Russian traditional gown instead.

To see full scale:

To read 
A look into Star Wars: Padme's Dresses. Part V click here.


Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good.
The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right.
Today, our goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

This might n…

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for us to join the yelling contest, I guess.
If we're going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise.

The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there.
In the tales that the Grimm Brothers…

The Costume Vault Anniversary!

Good day, beautiful readers!! First of all, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to everyone!

Today is a very special day for us, here at The Costume Vault. It's our anniversary!!! We're celebrating our third anniversary! Though to be honest, we didn't actually start this project seriously until last year... So, we're a three year old, with the experience of a one year old...? Oh, who cares. Today, three years ago, we published our first article ever. So, today is a day of celebration.
This project started out of a deep love for movies and costuming and a need to share that. And also boredom.... we had quite the free time back then, to be honest. But the project took off, and now we continue even when we don't have as much free time. But it's worth it, because we get to share our love for movies and costuming with you.
To this day, we've written sixty articles, most of which we are quite proud indeed. And what's even better, you seem to enjoy reading them…

The Dressmaker. Part I: A glamorous outsider

2015's The Dressmaker is the wet dream of any costume lover in all of its 120 minutes of runtime. The Aussie film directed by Jocelyn Moorhouse is the adaptation of the Rosalie Ham's homonymous novel. After quite an impressive run in the Festival Circuit (it premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival) and garnishing numerous nominations and wins worldwide, it finally got a theatrical release, becoming a box office success and the 11th highest-grossing film of all time in its home country.

So there certainly was a lot of hype around it when we finally got to see it and had a lot of expectations to live up to. ABOUT THE MOVIE So, is the movie actually that good? ... Sort of? Well, it's complicated. That's our official review tagline: it's complicated. The thing is; the movie has a ton of problems of all sorts. A lot of it doesn't work, but what does work, works really well.
Let's start with the negatives. First of all, the movie is a tonal shipwrec…

The Dressmaker. Part II: Makeover fever

The dressmaker, despite its many flaws is a fascinating movie to look at. And what makes it particularly interesting for us, is that it's a movie where the Costume Design happens to be what drives most of the visual narrative of the story.
Last week we had a look at Tilly's costume (by Margot Wilson) and how these define her and her arc throughout the movie, but, no matter how impressive Tilly's wardrobe is, it's only one half of the picture. It's Marion Boyce's work on the townsfolk around our main character that completes this mesmerizing ensemble. Because of it, we feel it would be unfair to ignore this other half, and therefore chose to divide this into two parts in order to better develop each of the sides.
And so, without further ado, let's dive into the other half of this equation. DUNGATAR AND THE MAKEOVER FEVER Dungatar is a fictional run-down street of houses in the middle of the Australian outback that tries to disguise itself as a town. It's…